Comparison the efficacy of single buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% mepivacaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine during maxillary premolar teeth extractio
Phase 4
- Conditions
- The pain during injecting local anesthesia by palatal infiltrationLocal Anesthesia , Infiltration Anesthesia
- Registration Number
- TCTR20220715003
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry , Chiangmai university
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Unknown
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
Inclusion Criteria
1. Participants who have been diagnosed with premolar teeth extraction in the upper jaw on both sides
2. No gender and age limit
3. Be in good health or AHA Classifications I and II
4. Not during the first or third trimester of pregnancy or breast-feeding.
5. Able to receive treatment and follow up at specified intervals
Exclusion Criteria
1. Participants who have any hypersensitivity to amide local anesthetics or components of anesthetics.
2. the premolar teeth have pathological signs and pain or there are periapical lesions.
3. Participants have any soft tissue infection.
4. Participants who received NSAIDs and acetaminophen 24 hours before the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Onset of local anesthesia after injected local anesthesia Gingival pricking test
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Duration of local anesthesia after local anesthesia was active Patient reported outcome using a interview,Pain during extraction after the procedure a visual analogue scale measuring 100 mm with 0 depicting no pain and 100 depicting severe pain,Complication of extraction within 1 day , 3 day and 7 day after the procedure Patient reported outcome using a interview