Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2022/08/044724
CTRI/2022/08/044724
Not yet recruiting
未知

Evaluation of efficacy of buccal infiltration anesthesia with 4% articaine for orthodontic extraction of mandibular premolars: a placebo controlled split mouth study

Dasmesh Institute Of Research and Dental Sciences Faridkot0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit

Overview

Phase
未知
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
Dasmesh Institute Of Research and Dental Sciences Faridkot
Status
Not yet recruiting
Last Updated
3 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional

Investigators

Sponsor
Dasmesh Institute Of Research and Dental Sciences Faridkot

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •1\.Age group of 15 to 25
  • •2\.Patients who want extraction of both left and right mandibular premolars
  • •3\.Patients belonging to ASA class I and II
  • •4\.Patients who grant consent to be a part of the study

Exclusion Criteria

  • •1\. History of allergy to local anesthetic agents
  • •2\. History of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or renal diseases
  • •3\. Patients on central nervous system depressants including alcohol or any analgesic medication within the last 48 hours
  • •4\. Pregnant and lactating females
  • •5\. Patients having abscess or any other lesion at the injection site

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Recruiting
Phase 3
The efficiency of buccal infiltration technique as an alternative to the inferior alveolar nerve block in the extraction of mandibular premolars: A novel clinical studyPain, paresthesia, hematomaBuccal infiltrationlidocainemandibular premolarsinferior alveolar nerve block.
TCTR20200407003none200
Completed
Phase 4
Comparing Two different agents of Local anesthesiaHealth Condition 1: 3- Administration
CTRI/2024/01/061711Dr Rohan Jiteshkumar Doshi182
Recruiting
Phase 1
Comprison of anesthetic efficacy of Buccal Infilteration versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve block for Pulpotomy in Mandibular Second Primary Molars in sedated patientsanesthetic efficacy.
IRCT20190313043046N2Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences30
Unknown
Not Applicable
Buccal Infiltration Technique Compared to Inferior Alveolar TechniqueLocal Anesthetic Complication
NCT04812639Cairo University22
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison between the Use of Only Buccal Infiltration and with palatal infiltration Of 2% Lidocaine with Epinephrine for The Removal of Maxillary TeethBuccal Infiltration, Palatal infiltration, Maxillary Teeth.Local anaestheticsY48.3
IRCT20230714058773N3Armed forces institute of dentistry CMH Rawalpindi260