CTRI/2024/01/061711
Completed
Phase 4
Comparative evaluation of Only buccal infiltration of 4% Articaine verses Buccal and palatal infiltration of 2% Lignocaine in patients with Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in maxillary molars: A Randomized clinical study - NI
Dr Rohan Jiteshkumar Doshi0 sites182 target enrollmentTBD
ConditionsHealth Condition 1: 3- Administration
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: 3- Administration
- Sponsor
- Dr Rohan Jiteshkumar Doshi
- Enrollment
- 182
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •1\. Systemically healthy both male and female patients between 18\-60 years of age will be included in the study.
- •2\.Patients diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with or without apical periodontitis giving prolonged response to cold test in maxillary molars.
- •3\.Patient should have actively experienced moderate to severe pain pre operatively on VAS scale above 4 is included in the study
- •4\.A written informed consent will be taken from all the patients and only those patients ready to sign the consent form will be included in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
- •1\.Patients allergic to local anesthetics or known allergy to Lignocaine and articaine will be excluded from study.
- •2\.Pregnant and lactating patients will be excluded from study.
- •3\.Patients taking any analgesics, antibiotics, sedatives, and antianxiety drugs on regular basis or before 24 hrs.of treatment will be excluded.
- •4\.Patient having necrosed tooth with sinus tracts/local gum swelling around the affected tooth.
- •5\. Patients with severe periodontitis and poor oral hygiene will be excluded from the study.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison between the Use of Only Buccal Infiltration and with palatal infiltration Of 2% Lidocaine with Epinephrine for The Removal of Maxillary TeethBuccal Infiltration, Palatal infiltration, Maxillary Teeth.Local anaestheticsY48.3IRCT20230714058773N3Armed forces institute of dentistry CMH Rawalpindi260
Recruiting
Phase 3
The efficiency of buccal infiltration technique as an alternative to the inferior alveolar nerve block in the extraction of mandibular premolars: A novel clinical studyPain, paresthesia, hematomaBuccal infiltrationlidocainemandibular premolarsinferior alveolar nerve block.TCTR20200407003none200
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Evaluation of the adequacy of anesthesia achieved by 4% Articaine buccal infiltration during extraction of lower premolars for orthodontic purposeCTRI/2022/08/044724Dasmesh Institute Of Research and Dental Sciences Faridkot
Completed
Phase 2
Comparison of two techniques of anesthesia in upper first molars using 4% articaine in irreversible pulpitisHealth Condition 1: null- Irreversible PulpitisCTRI/2016/09/007286Dr Anuprabha Shrivastava100
Unknown
Not Applicable
Buccal Infiltration Technique Compared to Inferior Alveolar TechniqueLocal Anesthetic ComplicationNCT04812639Cairo University22