IRCT20230714058773N3
Completed
未知
Comparison between the Use of Only Buccal Infiltration and with palatal infiltration Of 2% Lidocaine with Epinephrine for The Removal of Maxillary Teeth
Armed forces institute of dentistry CMH Rawalpindi0 sites260 target enrollmentTBD
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Buccal Infiltration, Palatal infiltration, Maxillary Teeth.
- Sponsor
- Armed forces institute of dentistry CMH Rawalpindi
- Enrollment
- 260
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •non\-restorable tooth due to extensive caries or periodontal disease or for orthodontic extractions
- •Patients between the age of 18 and 45 years
- •Patients having physical status 1 according to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Pregnant women, nursing mothers
- •Patient with non\-localized odontogenic infection
- •Tooth associated with pathologies i.e. cysts, fractures, tumors
- •Patients on radiotherapy, chemotherapy, bisphosphonates, bone diseases e.g. Paget’s disease.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 4
Comparing Two different agents of Local anesthesiaHealth Condition 1: 3- AdministrationCTRI/2024/01/061711Dr Rohan Jiteshkumar Doshi182
Completed
Phase 2
Comparison of two techniques of anesthesia in upper first molars using 4% articaine in irreversible pulpitisHealth Condition 1: null- Irreversible PulpitisCTRI/2016/09/007286Dr Anuprabha Shrivastava100
Recruiting
Phase 3
The efficiency of buccal infiltration technique as an alternative to the inferior alveolar nerve block in the extraction of mandibular premolars: A novel clinical studyPain, paresthesia, hematomaBuccal infiltrationlidocainemandibular premolarsinferior alveolar nerve block.TCTR20200407003none200
Unknown
Not Applicable
Buccal Infiltration Technique Compared to Inferior Alveolar TechniqueLocal Anesthetic ComplicationNCT04812639Cairo University22
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Evaluation of the adequacy of anesthesia achieved by 4% Articaine buccal infiltration during extraction of lower premolars for orthodontic purposeCTRI/2022/08/044724Dasmesh Institute Of Research and Dental Sciences Faridkot