IRCT20230714058773N3已完成Unknown
Comparison between the Use of Only Buccal Infiltration and with palatal infiltration Of 2% Lidocaine with Epinephrine for The Removal of Maxillary Teeth
Armed forces institute of dentistry CMH Rawalpindi0 个研究点目标入组 260 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- Unknown
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 260
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 years 至 45 years（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •non-restorable tooth due to extensive caries or periodontal disease or for orthodontic extractions
- •Patients between the age of 18 and 45 years
- •Patients having physical status 1 according to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification.
排除标准
- •Pregnant women, nursing mothers
- •Patient with non-localized odontogenic infection
- •Tooth associated with pathologies i.e. cysts, fractures, tumors
- •Patients on radiotherapy, chemotherapy, bisphosphonates, bone diseases e.g. Paget’s disease.
研究者
相似试验
已完成
4 期
Comparing Two different agents of Local anesthesiaCTRI/2024/01/061711Dr Rohan Jiteshkumar Doshi182
已完成
2 期
Comparison of two techniques of anesthesia in upper first molars using 4% articaine in irreversible pulpitisCTRI/2016/09/007286Dr Anuprabha Shrivastava100
招募中
3 期
The efficiency of buccal infiltration technique as an alternative to the inferior alveolar nerve block in the extraction of mandibular premolars: A novel clinical studyPain, paresthesia, hematomaBuccal infiltrationlidocainemandibular premolarsinferior alveolar nerve block.TCTR20200407003none200
Unknown
不适用
Buccal Infiltration Technique Compared to Inferior Alveolar TechniqueLocal Anesthetic ComplicationNCT04812639Cairo University22
尚未招募
不适用
Evaluation of the adequacy of anesthesia achieved by 4% Articaine buccal infiltration during extraction of lower premolars for orthodontic purposeCTRI/2022/08/044724Dasmesh Institute Of Research and Dental Sciences Faridkot