CTRI/2016/09/007286
Completed
Phase 2
Comparative Evaluation Of Maxillary Buccal Infiltration Technique With Buccal Plus Palatal Infiltration Technique In Maxillary 1st Molars using 4% Articaine In Patients With Irreversible Pulpitis : A Prospective, Randomized, Single-blind In vivo Study
Dr Anuprabha Shrivastava0 sites100 target enrollmentTBD
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- Irreversible Pulpitis
- Sponsor
- Dr Anuprabha Shrivastava
- Enrollment
- 100
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 4 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •1\. Subjects in between age groups 16\-45 years.
- •2\. Moderate to severe pain in maxillary 1st molar tooth.
- •3\. A positive response to cold testing with an ice stick \& an electric pulp tester.
- •4\. The ability of the subject to understand the use of pain scales.
- •5\. The subject should be in good health \& none should take any medication that would alter pain perception, as determined by oral questioning \& a written questionnaire.
- •6\. Absence of any periapical radiolucency on radiographs except for a widened periodontal ligament.
Exclusion Criteria
- •1\. Patients with systemic disorder like diabetes, hypertension, asthma etc.
- •2\. Patient having active pain in more than 1 maxillary molar.
- •3\. Subjects taking any pain relieving medication including OTC analgesics at least 12 hrs before enrolment in the study.
- •4\. Swelling near the tooth in question.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison between the Use of Only Buccal Infiltration and with palatal infiltration Of 2% Lidocaine with Epinephrine for The Removal of Maxillary TeethBuccal Infiltration, Palatal infiltration, Maxillary Teeth.Local anaestheticsY48.3IRCT20230714058773N3Armed forces institute of dentistry CMH Rawalpindi260
Completed
Phase 4
Comparing Two different agents of Local anesthesiaHealth Condition 1: 3- AdministrationCTRI/2024/01/061711Dr Rohan Jiteshkumar Doshi182
Recruiting
Phase 3
The Comparison of maxillary infiltration and mandibular block injection effect on the cardiovascular parameters with 2 different local anesthesia solutionsIRCT20140527017880N6Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences112
Unknown
Not Applicable
Buccal Infiltration Technique Compared to Inferior Alveolar TechniqueLocal Anesthetic ComplicationNCT04812639Cairo University22
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Evaluation of the adequacy of anesthesia achieved by 4% Articaine buccal infiltration during extraction of lower premolars for orthodontic purposeCTRI/2022/08/044724Dasmesh Institute Of Research and Dental Sciences Faridkot