TCTR20200407003招募中3 期
The efficiency of buccal infiltration technique as an alternative to the inferior alveolar nerve block in the extraction of mandibular premolars: A novel clinical study
none0 个研究点目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2020年4月7日最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 200
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 12 Years 至 80 Years（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients eligible for this study will include any subject with a clinical indication for tooth extraction in the mandibular 1st & 2nd premolars
排除标准
- •Any patient with allergy for local anesthetic components, physical and mental retardation, limitation in mouth opening, chronic abuse of psychotropic drugs, as well as swelling (infection) in and around the area of injection will be excluded from this study
研究者
相似试验
已完成
4 期
Comparing Two different agents of Local anesthesiaCTRI/2024/01/061711Dr Rohan Jiteshkumar Doshi182
尚未招募
不适用
Evaluation of the adequacy of anesthesia achieved by 4% Articaine buccal infiltration during extraction of lower premolars for orthodontic purposeCTRI/2022/08/044724Dasmesh Institute Of Research and Dental Sciences Faridkot
已完成
Unknown
Comparison between the Use of Only Buccal Infiltration and with palatal infiltration Of 2% Lidocaine with Epinephrine for The Removal of Maxillary TeethBuccal Infiltration, Palatal infiltration, Maxillary Teeth.Local anaestheticsY48.3IRCT20230714058773N3Armed forces institute of dentistry CMH Rawalpindi260
Unknown
不适用
Buccal Infiltration Technique Compared to Inferior Alveolar TechniqueLocal Anesthetic ComplicationNCT04812639Cairo University22
Unknown
4 期
Comparison the efficacy of single buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% mepivacaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine during maxillary premolar teeth extractioThe pain during injecting local anesthesia by palatal infiltrationLocal Anesthesia , Infiltration AnesthesiaTCTR20220715003Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry , Chiangmai university20