Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2020/01/023063
CTRI/2020/01/023063
Other
Phase 4

Comparison between buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with adrenaline and inferior alveolar nerve block of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline as local anesthetics for pulpal treatment in mandibular primary molars in 6-12 year -old children â?? A randomized controlled trial

Shivangi Manek0 sites55 target enrollmentTBD
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
Shivangi Manek
Enrollment
55
Status
Other
Last Updated
4 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
March 17, 2020
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional

Investigators

Sponsor
Shivangi Manek

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •1\. ASA category 1 children aged 6\-12 years.
  • •2\. Having a mandibular primary molar tooth requiring pulpal treatment.
  • •3\. Children requiring to undergo pulpal treatment under anesthesia for the first time

Exclusion Criteria

  • •1\. Children suffering from any systemic condition, particularly cardiovascular or endocrine (thyroid) disorder
  • •2\. Medically compromised children and children with limited cognitive abilities.
  • •3\. Severe acute infection in area of operation such as space abscess.
  • •4\. Children with known allergy to the drug and those who show allergic reactions at the time of testing.
  • •5\. Children whose parents refuse to give consent.
  • •6\. Children who do not co\-operate while performing the procedure

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Recruiting
Phase 2
Comparison of local anestasia by 4% articaine versus inferior alveolar nerveanestasia by 2%lidocaine in mandibular third molar surgerysurgery.Complications of procedures, not elsewhere classified
IRCT2017050933444N4DENTAL UNIVERSITY OF HORMOZGA70
Completed
Not Applicable
Articaine efficacy in primary second molar anesthesiapulpits.NOS-acute-chronic (hyperplastic)(ulcerative)-irreversible- reversible
IRCT20100125003168N5Reasearch Vice-Chancellor- Tabriz University of Medical Sciences38
Unknown
Phase 4
Comparison the efficacy of single buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% mepivacaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine during maxillary premolar teeth extractioThe pain during injecting local anesthesia by palatal infiltrationLocal Anesthesia , Infiltration Anesthesia
TCTR20220715003Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry , Chiangmai university20
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Buccal Infiltration of Different Volumes of Articaine for Extraction.Buccal InfiltrationArticaineAnesthesia
NCT06630819Qassim University114
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Effect of one injection during removal of tooth/teeth of upper jaw
CTRI/2019/12/022334Dr Monalisa