MedPath

iTBS/fMRI Study of Apex Control

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Registration Number
NCT06919172
Lead Sponsor
Florida State University
Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to examine the effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on the prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex.

Detailed Description

The Comprehensive Control Task (CCT) was designed to examine hierarchical control in a single, well-controlled factorial task. On each trial, participants view a letter surrounded by a colored shape at a particular screen location. Color cues the relevant feature, letter or location, for a block of trials. The first trial of a block requires a decision of whether the stimulus is the first position of a circular sequence (sequence start). Subsequent trials require a decision of whether the viewed stimulus follows the previous stimulus in a circular sequence (sequence 1-back). The letter sequence (T-A-B-L-E-T) and spatial sequence (Top-Bottom Right-Left-Right-Bottom Left-Top) are difficulty-matched.

Shape cues the task to perform. Squares indicate the standard baseline task, and each block begins and ends with baseline trials. Different shapes indicate sub-tasks. In Switching blocks, shape-switches (e.g. from square to circle or circle to square) cue the sequence start task. Shape-repeats cue the sequence 1-back task. In Planning blocks, triangle shapes indicate that the stimulus can be ignored (automatic "no" response). All the while, the last square-shaped stimulus must be retained as a reference for the next square-shaped stimulus. Finally, in Dual blocks, diamond shapes indicate switching (sequence start) and also planning. The reversion back to square shapes requires sequence matching to the distal, previous square.

The design is factorial with stimulus-domain x contextual control x temporal control orthogonally manipulated. Full details of the CCT have been previously described in published work.

The focus in this study will be comparison of MFG-TMS, IPL-TMS, and S1-TMS in an interleaved fMRI-TMS-fMRI design. The logic is to test the apical status of the MFG/IPL through the extent to which TMS impacts other PFC/PPC areas and behavior.

Each experiment will begin with 1 session of the CCT with fMRI to localize TMS targets. Each participant will then perform 3 counter-balanced sessions wherein a different site will be targeted by TMS followed immediately by fMRI on the CCT.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • Between the ages of 18 and 30
  • Right-handed
  • Native English speaker or fluent by the age of 6
Exclusion Criteria
  • History of psychiatric disorders
  • History of neurological disorders
  • Receiving medications for psychiatric or neurological disorders
  • Familial history of epilepsy
  • Taking any drugs or medications that are pro-epileptic
  • Tinnitus
  • Women who are pregnant

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in PFC-PPC activationbaseline, pre-intervention and immediately after intervention

blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal in areas of the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortex assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) \[note, this measure has no units\]

Change in PFC-PPC effective connectivitybaseline, pre-intervention and immediately after intervention

effective connectivity among areas of the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortex in the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) \[note, this measure has no units\]

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in temporal control accuracybaseline, pre-intervention and immediately after intervention

behavioral performance (percent correct) on conditions involving temporal control in the comprehensive control task

Change in contextual control speedbaseline, pre-intervention and immediately after intervention

behavioral performance (reaction time in milliseconds) on conditions involving contextual control in the comprehensive control task

Change in contextual control accuracybaseline, pre-intervention and immediately after intervention

behavioral performance (reaction time in milliseconds) on conditions involving contextual control in the comprehensive control task

Change in temporal control speedbaseline, pre-intervention and immediately after intervention

behavioral performance (reaction time in milliseconds) on conditions involving temporal control in the comprehensive control task

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Florida State University Psychology Department Building

🇺🇸

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

FSU MRI Facility

🇺🇸

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath