MedPath

Comparison of IVF and ICSI in Human IVF

Not Applicable
Conditions
Infertility
Interventions
Procedure: ICSI
Registration Number
NCT03513913
Lead Sponsor
Semmelweis University
Brief Summary

In this prospective randomized clinical trial we plan to compare two fertilization method which are widely used during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Outcome of conventional IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment will be compared in this study.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
600
Inclusion Criteria

Infertile patients entering in vitro fertilization treatment At least 1 oocytes collected Semen sample is suitable for IVF and ICSI fertilization as well Number of oocytes collected is lower than 5 AND/OR female age is equal or more than 40 years

Exclusion Criteria

Samen sample is not suitable for conventional IVF fertilization Previous conventional IVF treatment resulted in <50% fertilization rate

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
IVFICSIOocytes fertilized by conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) method
ICSIICSIOocytes fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) method
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Fertilization rate18 hours after insemination

Number of oocytes fertilized

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Implantation rate4 weeks after embryo transfer

Number of embryos implanted (/number of embryos transferred)

Clinical pregnancy rate4 weeks after the embryo transfer

Number of clinical pregnancies (/No. of embryo transfers)

Embryo quality36 and 72 hours after fertilization

Number and quality of blastomeres, amount of fragmentation, embryo grade

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Semmelweis University First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

🇭🇺

Budapest, Hungary

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath