Robotic Gait Training VS. Conventional Physical Therapy in Spinal Cord Injury Patients.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 16
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Wernig scale
研究概览
简要总结
Until now, there's still no any strong evidence supported "which is the best way to restoration walking ability" in spinal cord injury. Most of the evidence suggest that, there is somehow better after gait rehabilitation for ASIA classification C and D but not improved walking ability for ASIA classification A and B. There is an RCT showed the evidence of repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy could be improved walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke, these might be also really effect in SCI patients.
详细描述
This study aim to study the effectiveness of conventional rehabilitation compare with robotic gait training machine in subacute SCI patients.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 80 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Subacute spinal cord injury ( C5-T12 level) patients.
- •ASIA classification C and D.
- •No previous joint contracture.
- •No severely active medical condition.
- •Can easily communicate with no obvious cognitive impairment.
- •Given signed inform consent.
排除标准
- •Previous injury or other neurological condition that related to neurodeficit in key muscles.
结局指标
主要结局
Wernig scale
时间窗: 4 weeks.
Walking ability classification in spinal cord injury patients.
Barthel index
时间窗: 4 weeks.
Measure activity of daily living
次要结局
- Repas(4 weeks.)
- Manual muscle testing(4 weeks)
- 10 meter walking test(4 weeks.)
- 6 minute walking test(4 weeks)
研究者
Ratanapat Chanubol
Dr.
Prasat Neurological Institute