CTRI/2023/04/052056尚未招募Unknown
Prospective, randomized comparative study to evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy of topical minocycline gel 4% plus oral isotretinoin vs oral isotretinoin only in Indian patients with moderate to severe acne vulgaris
试验速览
- 阶段
- Unknown
- 状态
- 尚未招募
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •1.Patient has completed and signed an appropriately administered Informed Consent Form prior to any study related procedures. Patients less than 18 years of age must sign an Assent Form for the study.
- •2.Patients who have facial acne vulgaris with an IGA score of moderate 3 or severe 4.
- •3.Willing and able to apply minocycline gel 4% and take oral isotretinoin capsules as directed comply with study instructions and commit to visit the site for all follow up visits for the duration of the study.
- •4.If sexually active male patient must practice true abstinence or agree to use contraception during the study. Male patients should refrain from making sperm donations at any time during study participation and for at least 30 days following treatment discontinuation.
- •5. Willing to minimize exposure of the treated skin to ultraviolet light and extremes in weather such as wind or cold throughout the study.
- •6.Patient is in good general health and is free of any disease state or physical condition that exposes the patient to an unacceptable risk by study participation or impairs the evaluation of the patient or the treatments by participating in the study.
排除标准
- •1.Female who is pregnant lactating or breastfeeding, or is planning a pregnancy during the study.
- •2.Patients having Acne conglobata, acne fulminans secondary acne or any dermatological condition of the face that would require the use of confounding therapies or facial hair that could either interfere with clinical evaluations.
- •3.Patients with Sunburn on the face.
- •4.Severe systemic disease that might interfere with the conduct of the study or the interpretation of the results.
- •5.Abnormal Screening laboratory values that are considered clinically significant
- •6.Patient is currently enrolled in another investigational drug clinical trial or device study or is using or has used an investigational drug or investigational device treatment within 30 days of randomization.
- •7.Patient who in the opinion of the investigator, is unable or unlikely to comply with the requirements of the study protocol.
- •8.Patients excluded who have a history with Allergy to tetracycline class antibiotics or to any ingredient in the study drug, Pseudomembranous colitis or antibiotic-associated colitis, Hepatitis or liver damage or renal impairment, suspected premalignant or malignant disease
- •9.Patient not eligible, Within 1 week prior to randomization Medicated facial cleansers, Topical acne treatments, within 4 weeks with Topical retinoids on the face, Topical anti inflammatories Topical corticosteroids on body areas other than the face for more than 15 consecutive days and on more than 10 percent of body surface area. In flexural body areas,Systemic antibiotics, Systemic acne treatments Within 12 weeks prior to randomization with Systemic retinoid.
- •10.Patient has any acute illness within 48 hours, history of sensitivity,depression,Drug addiction or alcohol abuse,previous use of isotretinoin.
研究者
相似试验
已完成
3 期
study comparing the efficacy of post operative pain control with use of injection in spinal fluid with pain control drug vs usg guided regional pain control injection near surgical site in muscles in LSCS patients operated under spinal anaesthesiaCTRI/2024/01/061837Dr Apoorva
尚未招募
4 期
A study to evaluate the dose of propofol for general anaesthesia considering the weight of the patientCTRI/2017/10/010044Dr L H Hiranandani Hospital
招募中
4 期
A study to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine for general anaesthesia considering the weight of the patientCTRI/2018/05/013885Dr L H Hiranandani Hospital
已完成
4 期
Real-time USG thoracic epidural catheter insertion comparing to landmark techniqueThoracic epidural catheter insertion is a challenging procedure, and previous pieces of evidence together with our experience found that using land-mark technique had a highly failure rateThoracic Epidural Analgesia, Postoperative pain, Ultrasound guidance, Land-mark Technique, Regional Analgesia, Neuraxial BlockTCTR20200522002Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University96
已完成
3 期
comparative between real-time ultrasound-guided and landmark for thoracic epidural placementAge greater than or equal to 65-years-old Schedule for elective major abdominal and thoracic surgeryPlan to insert a thoracic epidural catheter for perioperative pain controlThoracic epidural placementelderlyreal-time ultrasound-assistedTCTR20220913004Faculty of medicine, Prince of Songkla university76