Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of LMA protector, LMAsupreme and LMA proseal in anaesthetized patients for laparoscopicsurgery, a prospective randomized study
Phase 2
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/02/063242
- Lead Sponsor
- SRI RAMACHANDRA MEDICAL COLLEGE & RESEARCH HOSPITA
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Adult patients of either gender of ASA (American society of
Anaesthesiologists) I and II for elective Laproscopic surgery under general
anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
Anticipated difficult airway
Pre-existing cervical spine disease
BMI greater than 35 kg/m2
Any lesion in the oral cavity or airway anatomic variation
Risk of Aspiration
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What design features of LMA Protector, Supreme, and Proseal influence oropharyngeal leak pressure in laparoscopic surgery?
How do LMA Protector, Supreme, and Proseal compare to endotracheal intubation in laparoscopic surgery safety and efficacy?
Which patient characteristics predict optimal LMA performance in laparoscopic procedures?
What are the common complications associated with LMA use during laparoscopic surgery and their management?
Are there alternative airway devices or adjuncts that enhance leak pressure in laparoscopic anesthesia?