MedPath

Comparison of Conventional Versus Transverse Mini-Incision Technique for Carpal Tunnel Release

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Registration Number
NCT07018011
Lead Sponsor
RESnTEC, Institute of Research
Brief Summary

This study aimed at to fill the gaps by comparing the surgical outcomes of the conventional versus transverse mini-incision technique for carpal tunnel syndrome in terms of pain and functional outcomes.

Detailed Description

The study findings would be helpful in determining the superiority of one surgical technique over the other for carpal tunnel release so that a quicker return to normal activities and work for those patients could be achieved, causing less pain and scarring. Due to frequent healthcare visits, quality of life can also be improved along with a decrease in morbidity.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
46
Inclusion Criteria
  • Any genders
  • Aged between 18 and 70 years
  • Presenting with symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome for at least 3 months duration, and having a VAS score > 4.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with wrists with thenar atrophy
  • Those who had previous CTR surgery
  • Local injection for CTS
  • Pregnant females
  • Patients suffering from inflammatory arthropathy
  • Polyneuropathy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain severity9 months

A score percentage of 0-40 on the visual analog scale was graded as good, 50-60 as fair, and 70-100 as poor

Functional outcome9 months

On functional severity scale, a score percentage of 20-45% was graded as good, 46-60% was graded as fair, and 61-100% was graded as poor.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Sahiwal Teaching Hospital

🇵🇰

Sahiwal, Punjab, Pakistan

Sahiwal Teaching Hospital
🇵🇰Sahiwal, Punjab, Pakistan
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath