Poul Gjessing Versus T Loops for Orthodontic Maxillary Canine Retraction
Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
- Conditions
- Canine Retraction
- Interventions
- Device: Poul GjessingDevice: T loops
- Registration Number
- NCT05727124
- Lead Sponsor
- Al-Azhar University
- Brief Summary
Poul Gjessing versus T loops for orthodontic maxillary canine
- Detailed Description
Split mouth study one side using Poul Gjessing spring and other side using T loops
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
Inclusion Criteria
-
- Class I or II div 1, orthodontic patients, with moderate to severe crowding who are indicated for maxillary first premolar extraction. 2- All permanent teeth are erupted (3rd molars are not included). 3- Good oral and general health. 4- No previous orthodontic treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
- 1- Orthodontic cases that could be treated with no indication for extraction therapy.
2- Orthodontic cases that are indicate for the extraction of any tooth other than maxillary first premolars. 3- Patients with systemic diseases that might interfere with the of orthodontic tooth movement.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Evaluation of Poul Gjessing spring for orthodontic maxillary canine retraction Poul Gjessing 20 Orthodontic patient treated by Poul Gjessing spring for canine retraction split mouth. Evaluation of T loop for orthodontic maxillary canine retraction T loops 20 Orthodontic patient treated by T loop for canine retraction split mouth
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method rate of canine retraction distance six months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Alazhar university
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt