MedPath

Implementation of CAPABLE in the Michigan Medicaid Waiver

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Independent Living
Interventions
Behavioral: MiCAP with IF (Main Study)
Behavioral: MiCAP with IF and Caregiver Engagement (Administrative Supplement)
Behavioral: MiCAP with IF and EF (Main Study)
Registration Number
NCT03634033
Lead Sponsor
Grand Valley State University
Brief Summary

Main study: Nearly half of older adults report problems with function, which can lead to difficulty with activities of daily living and nursing home placement. Thus, there is a need to implement evidence-based models of care to improve function and those factors that support function in older adults living in the community. One such model is CAPABLE (Community Aging in Place Advancing Better Living for Elders), a person-centered, nurse and occupational therapy intervention supported by assistive devices and home modifications. The investigators build on prior work that translated CAPABLE and conducted preliminary testing of a package of implementation strategies. This R15 application will test site-level adoption and sustainability after deploying a package of implementation strategies (readiness assessment, training, facilitation, champions, coalition building, and audit and feedback). Sites will be randomized to internal facilitation alone or internal facilitation plus external facilitation. This work will impact implementation science by testing two approaches to implementation of an evidence-based intervention to improve outcomes among older adults in a Medicaid Waiver program.

ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPLEMENT We extend the Parent Trial by addressing a problem found while deploying CAPABLE with beneficiaries with Alzheimer's disease (AD) or dementia. There are 39.8 million informal caregivers in the US and 16.3 million who care for someone with AD or dementia; and 1,500 of those are in the Michigan waiver. Most beneficiaries with those conditions did not accept CAPABLE as they were unable to receive instruction. Interventions that improve caregiver knowledge, confidence, and self-efficacy improve care they provide. Thus, the goal is to extend provision of CAPABLE to beneficiaries with AD or dementia via the engagement of their informal caregivers. This work is significant as there are 1,500 beneficiaries with AD or dementia in the waiver who could benefit from CAPABLE yet many did not, as they were to receive instructions. To date, CAPABLE has only been designed to be used directly with the individuals without caregiver involvement. In the waiver, beneficiaries are required to have a designated caregiver, therefore, modifying the toolkit for use by caregivers could aid in deploying CAPABLE to beneficiaries with AD or dementia.

Detailed Description

Main study: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) defines Implementation Science (IS) as the process of applying evidence to the treatment or prevention of human disease. In response, this trial is significant because it addresses testing of multimodal implementation strategies of an evidence-based intervention (CAPABLE) in a Medicaid setting to improve the quality and effectiveness of a waiver. Investigators will utilize implementation strategies refined in prior work (MiCAP; Hartford/Hillman/CMS) where the investigators trained clinicians (N=34) and provided CAPABLE for beneficiaries (N=270).

For this application, the investigators extend their work and train "all" Registered Nurses (RNs), Occupational Therapists (OTs), and Social Workers (SWs) (N=575) in the waiver sites in Michigan to implement the CAPABLE model of care for "all" Medicaid waiver beneficiaries (N=15,000). Guided by site managers, the team will select and train Internal Facilitators (IFs), who are supervisors/employees that work for the waiver site, to conduct facilitation at each site as "Champions". Investigators will utilize waiver employees as External Facilitators (EFs), who were early adopters of CAPABLE in prior work, as "Super-Champions" for Arm 2.

This trial is also significant as it addresses a critical barrier to implementation of evidence-based interventions to improve function in older adults living in the community to age-in-place (CAPABLE). Evidence suggest 90% of older adults prefer to age-in-place; yet a gap exists between their desire and ability. Thus, further testing of efficacy of an intervention (CAPABLE) in a Medicaid waiver population will fill a gap in science and build upon evidence.

The Institute of Medicine, NIH, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality have each established IS as a research priority so that the benefits of evidence-based interventions can be realized. Consequently, strategies (MiCAP) to overcome barriers and increase the pace and the effectiveness of implementation are a public health priority. The multimodal implementation strategies (MiCAP N=6) include: assessing readiness, conducting training, using IF Champions, building an IF coalition, and audit and feedback is adequate. Additionally, investigators will examine if the additive EF is required to support adoption and sustainability of an evidence-based intervention (CAPABLE).

Disabilities in basic activities of daily living (ADLs \[e.g., bathing, toileting\]) and instrumental ADLs (IADL \[e.g., shopping, cleaning\]) are the primary modifiable predictors of nursing home (NH) placement. Disability is also a major driver of increased risk of falls and may lead to poor quality-of-life. Disability creates an inability to carry out everyday ADLs. There are a number of risks for disability like complex medication regimens, poor balance and strength, inadequate communication with clinicians, falling, and unsafe ADL performance. In addition, unsafe environments and deteriorated housing increase risk.

To address this problem, the evidence-based intervention, CAPABLE, addresses modifiable intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors and considers the psychological, environmental, and physical factors to enhance function of disabled individuals and promote aging-in-place. A multi-component model of care, CAPABLE was designed to reduce the effect of problems with physical function among low-income older adults living at home by addressing an individual's capabilities and the home environment.

CAPABLE was adapted from the ABLE program. ABLE used a person-directed, consultative model involving 6 home sessions conducted by OTs and physical therapists who provided home alterations (assistive devices \[e.g., shower chair, reacher, raised toilet seat\], environmental modifications \[e.g., grab bar, ramps\], and select home modifications \[e.g., widen bathroom doorway\]) and instruction in various techniques to enable participants to achieve self-identified functional goals. CAPABLE is a 16-week structured program delivered by OTs who conduct 6 home visits and provide assistive devices, RNs who conduct 4 home visits, and a repairperson who provides home alterations (i.e., installs devices, environmental modifications, and home repair). CAPABLE's interdisciplinary team provides consultation with older adults to help them identify daily activity goals (e.g., taking a shower, walking to the bathroom), evaluate barriers to achieving those goals, and attain outcomes collaboratively. The OT addresses ADLs, IADLs, and discretionary activities at home such as functional mobility, meal preparation, bathing, and dressing. The RN targets underlying issues that influence ADLs, IADLs, and discretionary activities at home, such as pain reduction, improvement in mood, fall prevention, medication review and management, primary care physician communication, incontinence management, sexual health, and smoking cessation. CAPABLE draws upon approaches to enhance uptake and adoption of strategies by patients by assessing readiness and using motivational interviewing.

In this trial, the investigators move IS forward by examining a multimodal implementation strategy (MiCAP) approach to implement evidence (CAPABLE) in a Medicaid Waiver program. To fill an IS gap, investigators will use proven implementation strategies that are packaged (MiCAP) and delivered to clinicians in the waiver program sites to support beneficiary improvement in function and those factors that influence function in older disabled adults aging-in-place.

ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPLEMENT There is a paucity of literature on caregiver provision of assessment or direct care to individuals with AD or dementia, as most discuss burden, confidence, stress, depression, or health. In 2005, the AARP used a Delphi technique to identify caregiver competency domains of medical/nursing skills, assessment, measurement, collaborating, and communication. A review of caregiver training programs found problem solving, use of community resources, and communication to be the primary focus. Physical or emotional assessment, medical/nursing skills training, home exercises, medication management, or planning, like what is needed when delivering CAPABLE, appeared to be lacking in caregiver training. Regarding toolkit usage, Powell and colleagues recommend using toolkits when implementing interventions, and our parent trial uses a beneficiary toolkit. A recent review of 72 studies evaluating use of toolkits (i.e. weight management, fall prevention, vaccination, pain management, and patient safety) found 57% reported adherence to clinical procedures and toolkit effects were positive. This finding supports use of a toolkit with caregivers when CAPABLE is deployed with beneficiaries with AD or dementia. Many older adults cared for by informal caregivers have unmet needs. A 44.3% (38.2% ADL related, 14.6% IADL related) unmet need rate is common among older adults with caregivers. Higher rates of unmet needs are likely in beneficiaries in the waiver as they are multi-morbid and low-income with few resources and even worse in those with AD or dementia.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
7777
Inclusion Criteria

Waiver program site must be under contract as a Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) waiver provider in Michigan (including clinicians and beneficiaries). Waiver program site must use the Center for Information Management (CIM) electronic health record.

Exclusion Criteria

Waiver program site not under contract as a HCBS waiver provider in Michigan. Waiver program site not using the single electronic health record from Center for Information Management (CIM).

ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPLEMENT (all in main trial plus below):

Inclusion Criteria: Caregivers designated in beneficiary's record, and beneficiary diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease or dementia.

Exclusion Criteria: Without a caregiver or beneficiary not diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease or dementia.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
MiCAP with IF (Main Study)MiCAP with IF and Caregiver Engagement (Administrative Supplement)MiCAP with Internal Facilitation will receive MiCAP (implementation strategies). Internal facilitators will be waiver site clinicians with exemplary clinical practice and/or supervisory experience, who are expected to be early adopters of CAPABLE; and will be selected by their supervisors.
MiCAP with IF (Main Study)MiCAP with IF (Main Study)MiCAP with Internal Facilitation will receive MiCAP (implementation strategies). Internal facilitators will be waiver site clinicians with exemplary clinical practice and/or supervisory experience, who are expected to be early adopters of CAPABLE; and will be selected by their supervisors.
MiCAP with IF and EF (Main Study)MiCAP with IF (Main Study)MiCAP with Internal Facilitation and External Facilitation will receive MiCAP (implementation strategies) and the addition of external facilitation. The external facilitators will be Super-Champion waiver program site clinicians from prior work who were trained and early adopters of CAPABLE; and will be selected by the research team to perform external facilitation.
MiCAP with IF and EF (Main Study)MiCAP with IF and EF (Main Study)MiCAP with Internal Facilitation and External Facilitation will receive MiCAP (implementation strategies) and the addition of external facilitation. The external facilitators will be Super-Champion waiver program site clinicians from prior work who were trained and early adopters of CAPABLE; and will be selected by the research team to perform external facilitation.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Main Study: Effect of MiCAP With IF Alone Versus MiCAP With IF+EF on Site-level Outcomes of Adoption and Sustainability of CAPABLE9 months

Adoptions and sustainability of the intervention using the Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) at a site (18). SIC is a tool that tracks achievement of key activities when implementing an evidence-based intervention.

SIC has 6 stages with multiple implementation activities; each activity had an assigned numeric value and when a activity was completed, a score was assigned. The \*total\* SIC score ranges from 0-100. Stage 1 score range 0-12. Stage 2 0-16. Stage 3 0-24. Stage 4 0-16. Stage 5 0-16. Stage 6 0-16. The \*total\* score was calculated by summing the points of each stage. The higher the \*total\* score, the more implementation activities were completed.

For the below reported \*total\* score, each waiver site had their \*total\* SIC score numerically calculated. Then, the mean and standard deviation were calculated by group/arm.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Main Study: Beneficiary's IADLsExit (9-months)

Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs) was collected from the Minimum Data Set-Home Care (MDS-HC) in the Electronic Health Record (EHR). MDS-HC is a person-centered assessment for the collection of minimum essential nursing data, with reliability and validity, and used in the Michigan Medicaid Waiver program.

The below reported score is a summed score of 8 items on the MDS-HC; summed score range is 0-64. The lower the summed score, the more independent the beneficiary is at performing IADLs. For the 8 items, the available scores are 0= Independent, 1= Set-up help only, 2= Supervision, 3= Limited assistance, 4= Extensive assistance, 5= Maximal assistance, 6= Total dependence, 8= Activity did not occur during entire period.

Main Study: Beneficiary's PainExit (9-months)

Pain data were collected from the Minimum Data Set-Home Care (MDS-HC) in the Electronic Health Record (EHR). MDS-HC is a person-centered assessment for the collection of minimum essential nursing data, with reliability and validity, and used in the Michigan Medicaid Waiver program.

The score is a summed score of 4 self-reported items on the MDS-HC; the summed score range is 0-11. The lower the summed score, the less pain the beneficiary reported. The four items included: pain frequency (range 0-3); pain intensity (0-4); pain consistency (0-3); and breakthrough pain (0-1).

Main Study: Beneficiary's ADLs Summed ScoreExit (9-months)

Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) data were collected from the Minimum Data Set-Home Care (MDS-HC) in the Electronic Health Record (EHR). MDS-HC is a person-centered assessment for the collection of minimum essential nursing data, with reliability and validity, and used in the Michigan Medicaid Waiver program.

The score is a summed score of 11 items on the MDS-HC; with a score range of 0-88. The lower the summed score, the more independent the beneficiary is at performing ADLs. For the 11 items, the available scores are 0= Independent, 1= Set-up help only, 2= Supervision, 3= Limited assistance, 4= Extensive assistance, 5= Maximal assistance, 6= Total dependence, 8= Activity did not occur during entire period.

Main Study: Beneficiary's DepressionExit (9-months)

Depression was collected from the Minimum Data Set-Home Care (MDS-HC) in the Electronic Health Record (EHR). MDS-HC is a person-centered assessment for the collection of minimum essential nursing data, with reliability and validity, and used in the Michigan Medicaid Waiver program.

The below reported score is a summed score of 3 self-reported items on the MDS-HC; the summed score range is 0-24. The lower the summed score, the less depressed the beneficiary reported. The 3 items included: little interest in things; anxious, restless, or uneasy; and sad, depressed, or hopeless. For the 3 items, the available scores are 0= Not in last 3 days, 1= Not in last 3 days, but often feels that way, 2= In 1-2 days of last 3 days, 3= Daily in last 3 days, 8= Person could not (would not) respond.

Main Study: Beneficiary's Fall RateExit (9-months)

Beneficiary falls data were collected from the Minimum Data Set-Home Care (MDS-HC) in the Electronic Health Record. MDS-HC is a person-centered assessment for the collection of minimum essential nursing data, with reliability and validity, and used in the Michigan Medicaid Waiver program.

Falls were reported as proportions of occurrences on the MDS-HC; and calculated for this study based on the occurrence of a fall where yes=1 and no=0 divided by the number of participants.

Main Study: Beneficiary's Emergency Department (ED) Visits Occurrences Out of Total Number of Participants.Exit (9-months)

Beneficiary-level outcome emergency department (ED) data were collected from the Minimum Data Set-Home Care (MDS-HC) in the Electronic Health Record. MDS-HC is a person-centered assessment for the collection of minimum essential nursing data, with reliability and validity, and used in the Michigan Medicaid Waiver program.

ED visits were reported as proportion calculated based on the occurrence of an ED visit where yes=1 and no=0 out of the number of participants.

Main Study: Beneficiary's Hospitalization Occurrences Out of Total Number of Participants.Exit (9-months)

Beneficiary-level outcomes hospitalizations data were collected from the Minimum Data Set-Home Care (MDS-HC) in the Electronic Health Record. MDS-HC is a person-centered assessment for the collection of minimum essential nursing data, with reliability and validity, and used in the Michigan Medicaid Waiver program.

Hospitalizations were reported based on the occurrence and calculated for this study as rates of hospitalization where yes=1 and no=0 out of total number of participants.

Trial Locations

Locations (18)

Area Agency on Aging of Western Michigan, Inc.

🇺🇸

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Senior Resources

🇺🇸

Muskegon, Michigan, United States

Northeast Michigan Community Service Agency (NEMCSA)

🇺🇸

Alpena, Michigan, United States

Valley Area Agency on Aging

🇺🇸

Flint, Michigan, United States

Senior Services

🇺🇸

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Tri-County Office on Aging

🇺🇸

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Area Agency on Aging of Northwest Michigan

🇺🇸

Traverse City, Michigan, United States

Region 3B Area Agency on Aging/CareWell Services Southwest

🇺🇸

Battle Creek, Michigan, United States

Macomb-Oakland Regional Center Home Care, Inc.

🇺🇸

Clinton Township, Michigan, United States

Region 2 Area Agency on Aging

🇺🇸

Brooklyn, Michigan, United States

Region VII Area Agency on Aging

🇺🇸

Bay City, Michigan, United States

Detroit Area Agency on Aging

🇺🇸

Detroit, Michigan, United States

UPCAP

🇺🇸

Escanaba, Michigan, United States

A&D Home Health Care, Inc.

🇺🇸

Saginaw, Michigan, United States

Region IV Area Agency on Aging

🇺🇸

Saint Joseph, Michigan, United States

The Information Center

🇺🇸

Taylor, Michigan, United States

Northern Lakes Community Mental Health/Northern Health Care Management

🇺🇸

Traverse City, Michigan, United States

The Senior Alliance

🇺🇸

Wayne, Michigan, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath