MedPath

Donor Outcomes Following Hand-Assisted and Robotic Living Donor Nephrectomy: a Retrospective Review

Recruiting
Conditions
Transplant
Kidney Diseases
Interventions
Procedure: kidney transplant
Registration Number
NCT04182607
Lead Sponsor
Methodist Health System
Brief Summary

1.1. Background: Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for eligible patients with end-stage renal disease. It provides better outcomes in terms of life expectancy and quality of life than dialysis (Liu, Narins, Maley, Frank, \& Lallas, 2012). Kidney transplants from living donors also have additional benefits in terms of graft function and survival compared to transplants from cadaver donors (Galvani et al., 2012). Living donor transplants provide an opportunity to have good quality grafts and to perform the procedure when the recipient is in an optimal clinical status (Creta et al., 2019).

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was first introduced in 1995 and is currently accepted as the gold standard for kidney procurement from living donors. The first worldwide robotic assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was performed in 2000 by Horgan et al. (Horgan et al., 2007).

The main obstacle to living donation is the exposure of a healthy subject to the risks of a major surgical intervention. Therefore, efforts have been made to reduce complications and postoperative pain, achieve faster recovery, and minimize the surgical incisions.

Minimally invasive procedures like hand-assisted and robotic approaches greatly enhance living donation rates, and in 2001 the number of living donors exceeded the number of cadaver donors (Horgan et al., 2007).

1.2. Aim(s)/Objective(s): The objective of this study is to compare intra- and postoperative patient outcomes of kidney donors following hand-assisted and robotic kidney transplants at a single center.

1.3. Rationale for the study: More research is needed regarding the differences between minimally invasive approaches to kidney transplantation.

Detailed Description

This is a retrospective, single-center cohort study. Clinical data will be collected from electronic medical records (EMRs) on donors and recipients who underwent a minimally invasive kidney transplantation procedure. Data from all patients who had a hand-assisted or robotic minimally invasive kidney transplantation procedure at Methodist Dallas Medical Center (MDMC) between January 2006 and November 2019 will be included in the study.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
240
Inclusion Criteria
  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Kidney donors and recipients who underwent a hand-assisted or robotic kidney transplant
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients that do not meet the Study Inclusion Criteria laid out above

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
robotic kidney transplantkidney transplantKidney donors and recipients who underwent a robotic kidney transplant
hand-assisted kidney transplantkidney transplantKidney donors and recipients who underwent a hand-assisted kidney transplant
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
hospital length of stay (LOS) (days from admit to discharge)between January 2006 and November 2019

hospital length of stay (LOS) (days from admit to discharge) of donors and recipients will be compared between surgical techniques (i.e., hand-assisted vs. robotic).

BMI (kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2))between January 2006 and November 2019

BMI (kilogram per square meter (kg/m\^2)) of donors and recipients will be compared between surgical techniques (i.e., hand-assisted vs. robotic).

estimated blood loss (EBL) (milliliters (mL))between January 2006 and November 2019

estimated blood loss (EBL) of donors and recipients will be compared between surgical techniques (i.e., hand-assisted vs. robotic).

hospital-based charges/costsbetween January 2006 and November 2019

hospital-based charges/costs of donors and recipients will be compared between surgical techniques (i.e., hand-assisted vs. robotic).

Patient demographicsbetween January 2006 and November 2019

Patient demographics of donors and recipients will be compared between surgical techniques (i.e., hand-assisted vs. robotic).

Kidney Lateralitybetween January 2006 and November 2019

A chart review of which kidney (left versus right) was donated

operating room (OR) time (minutes)between January 2006 and November 2019

operating room (OR) time (minutes) of donors and recipients will be compared between surgical techniques (i.e., hand-assisted vs. robotic).

warm ischemia time (minutes)between January 2006 and November 2019

warm ischemia time (minutes) of donors and recipients will be compared between surgical techniques (i.e., hand-assisted vs. robotic).

complications (using Clavien-Dindo scale)between January 2006 and November 2019

complications (using Clavien-Dindo scale) of donors and recipients will be compared between surgical techniques (i.e., hand-assisted vs. robotic).

30-day readmissionsbetween January 2006 and November 2019

30-day readmissions of donors and recipients will be compared between surgical techniques (i.e., hand-assisted vs. robotic).

creatinine levels at discharge (milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL))between January 2006 and November 2019

creatinine levels at discharge (milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)) of donors and recipients will be compared between surgical techniques (i.e., hand-assisted vs. robotic).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The Liver Institute at Methodist Dallas Medical Center

🇺🇸

Dallas, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath