Does the Selection of Patients Helps Healing the Infection After Change in One Step of a Knee Replacement?
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 60
- 主要终点
- Recovery from the infection measured visually
研究概览
简要总结
The infection of a total knee replacement often imposes changing implants. The change in two step is currently considered the gold standard. The change in one step is a much debated attitude: strictly contra-indicated for some professionals, but others agree to reserve these for favorable suspected cases selected. Several criteria have been proposed in the literature: age, condition, duration of infection, known bacterium responsible, not virulent and sensitive to antibiotics, no fistula, no significant bone destruction. But these criteria are poorly validated, standing over an experience of surgical teams rather than high-level scientific studies. Some authors have proposed to achieve change in one step systematically. The results of these cohorts on healing the infection does not seem very different from the changes in two steps. But it is most often single-center series, uncontrolled, with small numbers.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Other
- 时间视角
- Retrospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients over 18 years
- •Patient having surgery for the management of knee infection after change in one step of a knee replacement prothesis in the participating services between 2000 and 2010.
排除标准
- •Patients under 18 years
结局指标
主要结局
Recovery from the infection measured visually
时间窗: for the duration of hospital stay, up to 1 year
show that the selection process of patients used improve treatment outcomes of infection in total knee replacement
次要结局
未报告次要终点
