MedPath

Motivational Interviewing With Diabetes Patients

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Type 2 Diabetes
Registration Number
NCT05187806
Lead Sponsor
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)
Brief Summary

This study was conducted in a quasi-experimental research design with a pretest-posttest control group to determine the effect of motivational interviewing on self-management and HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes. The sample of the study consisted of 25 experimental and 26 controls, who applied to an outpatient clinic in a training and research hospital.

Detailed Description

This study was conducted in a quasi-experimental research design with a pretest-posttest control group to determine the effect of motivational interviewing on self-management and HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes. The sample of the study consisted of 25 experimental and 26 controls, who applied to an outpatient clinic in a training and research hospital. After the pretest, the experimental group was intervened with a motivational interview (MI) method that consisted of four sessions; the control group received routine treatment.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • 18 years and older
  • Having been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for more than 3 months
  • Being in the contemplation
  • Preparation, and/or action stages of any section of the Behavioral Change Stage Identification Form of the Trans-Theoretical Model
  • Having HbA1c levels above 6
  • Agreeing to take part in the study
Exclusion Criteria
  • Having a perception disorder that will prevent communication
  • Having been diagnosed with any mental disorder

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison of the pretest-posttest Diabetes Self-management Instrument-35 scores3 months

The instrument is comprised of 35 questions covering the period from the previous three months to determine the frequency of the implementation of the self-management skills of the patients. The total score for the Instrument ranged from 35 to 140. A higher score showed that self-management activities were implemented on a more regular basis. Interventions consisted of four sessions of 30-60 (mean 45 min) min each. The sessions were structured according to the Behavior Change Stage Identification Form developed by the researcher by making use of the trans-theoretical model and adapting it to diabetic patients.The discussions were completed in four weeks, with one discussion held every week. The final test and the Diabetes Self-Management Instrument were applied again to the members of the intervention group in the third month after completion of the MI method sessions and in the third month to the control group.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison of the pretest-posttest HbA1c values3 months

The pretest and posttest HbA1c values of the patients in the experimental and control groups were compared in the third month.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ministry of Health, Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital

🇹🇷

Istanbul, Turkey

Ministry of Health, Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital
🇹🇷Istanbul, Turkey

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.