MedPath

Comparing post-operative pain control of ultrasound-guided bilateral modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach and ultrasound-guided bilateral external oblique intercoastal plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy : A Randomized Clinical Trial

Phase 4
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Medical and Surgical,
Registration Number
CTRI/2025/04/085237
Lead Sponsor
Abid K Dodamani
Brief Summary

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed procedures and has a short postoperative hospital stay. Even though laparoscopic cholecystectomy results in less postoperative pain than open cholecystectomy, severe pain is a common complaint, particularly in the first 24 hours. The effectiveness of ultrasound-guided inter-fascial plane blocks has recently come to the fore in the field of regional anaesthesia and pain management.

This study will be a randomized double-blinded clinical study to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided bilateral modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondrial approach and ultrasound-guided bilateral external oblique intercostal plane block in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

After approval from the research ethics board of RIMS, Imphal, a total number of 58 patients (18-65 years, ASA I and II, BMI < 30kg/m2) will be randomized into one of the two groups (n=29) after taking written informed consent from the patients. Following anaesthesia induction and patient intubation, group M-TAPA will receive a modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through a perichondrial approach with 20ml of inj. Ropivacaine 0.25% bilaterally and group EOIPB will receive an external oblique intercostal plane blocks with 20ml of Inj. Ropivacaine 0.25% bilaterally.

Postoperatively patients will be shifted to PACU, where the assessment of VRS scores, will be recorded at designated periods. Total analgesic consumption up to 24 hours, and time of first rescue analgesia will be recorded. Data will be recorded in a proforma tabulated in the EXCEL software and analyzed using IBM SPSS Version 26 software. A p-value of less than 0.05 will be taken as statistically significant.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
58
Inclusion Criteria
    1. Patients of age group 18-65 years.
    1. Patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II.
Exclusion Criteria
    1. Patients with active block injection site infections.
    1. Patients on anticoagulants or clinically significant coagulopathy.
    1. Patients with history of hypersensitivity to amide group of local anaesthetic agents.
    1. Patients receiving opioids for chronic analgesic therapy.
    1. Patients with preoperative use of any pain reliever within 24 hours.
    1. Patients with alcohol use or drug use (daily usage for the past 1 month).
    1. Patients with body mass index (BMI) more than 30kgm-2.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Total analgesic consumption in the first 24 hours of the postoperative period1st 24 hours of post-operative period
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparing the VRS scores at rest and movement in the first 24 hours of the postoperative periodVRS scores will be assessed at rest and movement in the first 24 hours of the postoperative period

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Regional Institute of Medical Sciences

🇮🇳

West, MANIPUR, India

Regional Institute of Medical Sciences
🇮🇳West, MANIPUR, India
Dr Abid K Dodamani
Principal investigator
7259252091
kdabid105@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.