Pilot: Feasibility of Intermittent Enteral Feeding in Ventilated MICU Patients
- Conditions
- Nutrition
- Interventions
- Dietary Supplement: Intermittent Enteral Nutrition Protocol
- Registration Number
- NCT04164108
- Lead Sponsor
- Yale University
- Brief Summary
Specific Aims:
Aim 1: Evaluate the feasibility of intermittent feeding in intensive care unit patients who are mechanically ventilated.
Aim 2: Evaluate the safety and patient tolerance of intermittent feeding in intensive care unit patients who are mechanically ventilated.
Aim 3: Determine efficacy of intermittent feeding in provision of required nutrition in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients.
Aim 4: Determine association of intermittent enteral feeding with glycemic control in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients.
- Detailed Description
With the advent of the feeding pump, default enteral nutrition schedules in many medical intensive care units has shifted from intermittent or bolus feeding to continuous feeds. Clinical studies suggest that each of these strategies of providing nutrition is safe for patients with no significant difference in glycemic control or adverse effects. There is also data to suggest that approximating a more physiologic nutrition schedule with periods of feeding and periods of fasting may optimize gastrointestinal and metabolic hormonal feedback loops thereby effecting outcomes such as gastrointestinal motility, protein synthesis, and glycemic control, among others. Circadian rhythm research supports a temporally restricted period of feeding as well. Furthermore, periods of scheduled fasting will allow for provision of care that is incompatible with enteral feeds, without interrupting administration of nutrition (for example, procedures or testing, incompatible medications, etc).
Aims 1 and 2 will clarify whether an intermittent enteral nutrition schedule is acceptable to ICU staff and patients. Aims 3 and 4 will test whether this enteral feeding schedule is effective in providing patients with required nutrition and acceptable glycemic control.
This pilot will set the stage for a randomized controlled trial further investigating superiority of intermittent feeding as compared with the current standard of continuous feeding.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 14
- Medical intensive care unit patients located in Yale-New Haven Hospital, York Street campus, North Pavilion 9 or 10.
- Hospitalized for less than or equal to 72 hours.
- Patients who are mechanically ventilated via endotracheal tube for at least 24 hours.
- Patients must have enteral access (nasogastric tube, orogastric tube).
- Team plans to initiate tube feeds.
- Prior upper gastrointestinal surgery (including but not limited to gastric bypass surgery, gastric banding, complete or partial gastrectomy, Whipple procedure; cholecystectomy is acceptable).
- Chronic enteral nutrition (prior to current admission).
- History of significant esophageal dysmotility (history of GERD is acceptable).
- Unable to have head of bed elevated at least 30 degrees while intubated and being fed (this is standard protocol).
- Enteral access terminates post-pyloric (ie nasojejunal or jejunostomy tubes are to be excluded).
- Pre-existing percutaneous gastrostomy tube.
- History of small bowel obstruction or ileus on current admission.
- History of gastroparesis.
- Clinical care team is not planning to initiate enteral nutrition.
- At risk of refeeding syndrome.
- Pregnant patients.
- Patients receiving neuromuscular blockade.
- Patients with glycemic emergency (HHNK, DKA, severe hypoglycemia resulting in MICU admission).
- Patients otherwise excluded by the treating physician.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SEQUENTIAL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Intermittent feed participants Intermittent Enteral Nutrition Protocol Patients admitted to medical ICU #1 (of 2 at our hospital) will be assigned to receive intermittent enteral feeding protocol. They will receive four equal volume feeds at 8:00, 12:00, 16:00, and 20:00 hours.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Proportion complete protocol Up to 7 days This is defined as the proportion of patients who continue to receive intermittent enteral feeds during the entire course of their enteral nutrition or seven days, whichever comes first.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Proportion correct pump rate Up to 7 days This is defined as the proportion of the feeds that enteral feeding pump provides nutrition at appropriate rate.
Adequate nutrition provision Up to 7 days This is defined as the proportion of days that patient is receiving enteral nutrition that at least 70% of caloric need is administered.
Proportion clogged enteral access Up to 7 days This is defined as the proportion of patients whose enteral access is clogged.
Staff satisfaction Up to 7 days This will be measured using a qualitative survey of bedside nurses and ICU nutritionists regarding perceptions of intervention feasibility.
Proportion held to accommodate a medication Up to 7 days This is defined as the proportion of patients who had enteral nutrition held to accommodate a medication.
Proportion Diarrhea Up to 7 days This is defined as the proportion of patients with diarrhea.
Symptomatic elevated gastric residual volume Up to 7 days This is defined as the proportion of patients with gastric residual volume \>500 AND any of the following symptoms:
* New onset nausea or vomiting
* Clinical concern for ileus or obstruction, as documented in progress notes
* New onset abdominal distension, as documented in progress notes
* Abdominal X-ray (not obtained for purposes of line/tube placement verification)Early mobility Up to 7 days This is defined as the proportion of patients able to participate in early mobility.
Proportion feeding intolerance Up to 7 days This is defined as the proportion of patients with one or more of the following conditions:
* New onset nausea or vomiting
* Clinical concern for ileus or obstruction, as documented in progress notes
* New onset abdominal distension, as documented in progress notes
* Abdominal X-ray (not obtained for purposes of line/tube placement verification)Percent of recommended nutrition delivered Up to 7 days This is defined as the average daily calorie intake as percentage of goal calories (determined by RD).
Nutrition delay Up to 7 days This is defined as the time (hours) from intubation to patient receiving 50% of caloric needs.
Proportion completed meals Up to 7 days This is defined as the proportion of meals that are delivered.
Proportion held to accommodate a procedure Up to 7 days This is defined as the proportion of patients who had enteral nutrition held to accommodate a procedure.
Inadequate nutrition provision Up to 7 days This is defined as the proportion of days that patient is receiving enteral nutrition that less than 30% of caloric need is administered.
Insulin drip usage Up to 7 days This is defined as the proportion of glucose measurements closest to 8:00, 12:00, 16:00, 20:00 (including on basic metabolic panel and point of care testing) that are less than or equal to 60.
Non-diabetic insulin usage proportion Up to 7 days This is defined as the proportion of patients who do not have a pre-existing diagnosis of diabetes mellitus who require any insulin dose.
Hyperglycemia proportion Up to 7 days This is defined as the proportion of glucose measurements closest to 8:00, 12:00, 16:00, 20:00 (including on basic metabolic panel and point of care testing) that are greater than or equal to 180.
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Yale New Haven Hospital
🇺🇸New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Yale New Haven Hospital, York Street Campus
🇺🇸New Haven, Connecticut, United States