A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Nasal With Buccal Oxygen Administration for Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration

Antalya Training and Research Hospital1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentDecember 24, 2020

ConditionsLung Diseases

Overview

Phase: Not Applicable
Intervention: Not specified
Conditions: Lung Diseases
Sponsor: Antalya Training and Research Hospital
Enrollment: 60
Locations: 1
Primary Endpoint: hypoxia-related interruptions
Status: Completed
Last Updated: 5 years ago

Overview Investigators Eligibility Criteria Outcomes Sites Similar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare to nasal and buccal oxygen administration in patients undergoing Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration .

Detailed Description

Anesthesia for Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) may be range from routine bronchoscopy sedation to general anesthesia. During sedation to EBUS increased duration of anesthesia and sedative dosing put patients at increased risk for hypoxic events. To avoid this, oxygen supplementation is mandatory. There are different techniques for oxygen supplementation during the procedure. At this study we will compare to nasal and buccal oxygen supplementations during EBUS.

Registry

clinicaltrials.gov

Start Date

December 24, 2020

End Date

April 6, 2021

Last Updated

5 years ago

Study Type

Interventional

Study Design

Parallel

Sex

All

Investigators

Sponsor

Antalya Training and Research Hospital

Responsible Party

Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

•patients ≥18 years of age
•body mass index (BMI) between 20 and 30
•American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III

Exclusion Criteria

•congestive heart failure
•ischemic heart disease
•increased intracranial pressure
•known allergy or contraindication to study drugs (propofol, fentanyl, or midazolam)
•an anatomical feature precluding adequate positioning of the buccal device.