A Prospective Randomized Controlled Monocentric Study Comparing Digital Sedation Versus Intravenous Sedation Among Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 终止
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 90
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To confirm the feasibility of using digital sedation in colonoscopy (stage 1)
研究概览
简要总结
This prospective Randomized Controlled Trial will evaluate efficacy, safety, and pharmacoeconomic outcomes in patients undergoing colonoscopy with either Digital Sedation using the Aqua© module of the Oncomfort device (Sedakit TM) or the standard of care, intravenous sedation with propofol. The Aqua© module is designed for sedation and management of pain and anxiety related to medical and surgical procedures.
详细描述
This prospective Randomized Controlled Trial will evaluate efficacy, safety, and pharmacoeconomic outcomes in patients undergoing colonoscopy with either Digital Sedation using the Aqua© module of the Oncomfort device (Sedakit TM) or the standard of care, intravenous sedation with propofol. The Aqua© module is designed for sedation and management of pain and anxiety related to medical and surgical procedures.
Participants will be recruited during the anesthesiology consultation conducted in preparation for colonoscopy. Those with indication for screening or diagnostic colonoscopy under conventional intravenous sedation (propofol) and willing to participate will provide their written informed consent and will be randomized (2:1) between two arms:
- Experimental arm: Digital Sedation, with rescue intravenous sedation (propofol) if needed upon patient request
- Control arm: conventional intravenous sedation (propofol)
The study will be divided into three stages, with randomization (2:1) maintained throughout. In the first stage, accrual will be halted when about 45 patients have been randomized, at least 27 of whom being evaluable patients randomized to the experimental arm. A non-binding futility analysis is planned for the primary outcome. In the second stage, accrual will be halted when about 90 patients have been randomized. A non-binding futility analysis is planned for the primary outcome. If the milestones are met, accrual will be reopened to the second stage and the study will continue to the planned final accrual of 177 patients (118 to experimental and 59 to control arm, respectively). At the end of the recruitment of Stage 1 and 2, an analysis of the secondary outcomes will also be run. Results of these analysis could also impact the decision for pursuing to second/ third stage.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Age of 18 years or older
- •Indication for screening or diagnostic colonoscopy under conventional IVS (propofol)
- •Provision of written informed consent
排除标准
- •Scheduled dilation
- •Active Crohn Disease
- •Low auditory acuity that precludes use of the device
- •Low visual acuity that precludes use of the device
- •Head or face wounds precluding use of the device
- •Schizophrenia
- •Dizziness
- •Water/sea phobia
- •Non-proficiency in French or Dutch (research language)
研究组 & 干预措施
Digital Sedation
Digital Sedation with rescue intravenous sedation (propofol) if needed upon patient request
干预措施: Aqua© 30 on Oncomfort SedakitTM (Device)
Digital Sedation
Digital Sedation with rescue intravenous sedation (propofol) if needed upon patient request
干预措施: Propofol (Drug)
Intravenous sedation
Control arm with conventional Intravenous sedation
干预措施: Propofol (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
To confirm the feasibility of using digital sedation in colonoscopy (stage 1)
时间窗: Day 1
cecal intubation rate, rate of rescue sedation
To demonstrate adequate performance of colonoscopy using digital sedation (stage 2)
时间窗: Day 1
cecal intubation rate, rate of rescue sedation
次要结局
- To assess gastroenterologist and anesthesiologist satisfaction in both arms(Day 1)
- To compare measures of colonoscopy performance in both arms(Day 1)
- To compare the safety in both arms(Screening, Day 1 & Day 2 Follow-up call)
- To compare patient experience in both arms(Day 1 & Day 2 Follow-up call)
- To compare use of sedation medication in both arms(Day 1)
- To assess the need for rescue sedation in the experimental arm(Day 1)
- To assess gastroenterologist and anesthesiologist stress in both arms(Day 1)
- To compare physiologic measures in both arms(Day 1)
- To assess difficulty or ease of the procedure in both arms(Day 1)
