Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01288833
NCT01288833
Completed
Not Applicable

Real Time Colorectal Polyp Diagnosis in Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Close Focus High Definition Narrow Band Imaging Colonoscopy Compared to Conventional Histopathology Diagnosis - the VALID (Veterans Affairs Lesion Interpretation and Diagnosis) Colonoscopy Study

VA Palo Alto Health Care System2 sites in 1 country558 target enrollmentMarch 2011

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Colorectal Neoplasm
Sponsor
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Enrollment
558
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Rate of Accurate High Confidence Polyp Histology Predictions by the Endoscopist in the Two Groups.
Status
Completed
Last Updated
7 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The investigators hypothesize that high definition colonoscopy with close focus narrow band imaging features has a high diagnostic accuracy for colorectal polyp histology, and can replace formal pathologic assessment in cases of high diagnostic confidence.

Detailed Description

A recent single arm prospective cohort study suggested that high definition colonoscopy with narrow band imaging is an acceptable strategy to diagnose polyp histology and determine future surveillance intervals. Endoscopic proficiency in macroscopic features to differentiate polyp histology can be attained in a relatively short time period. A new high definition colonoscope with close focus narrow band imaging features may further improve diagnostic accuracy for polyp differentiation, and can replace formal pathologic assessment in cases of high diagnostic confidence. Primary Aim: Compare the diagnostic accuracy of high definition narrow band imaging colonoscopy with and without close focus features for the macroscopic differentiation of neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal lesions using histopathologic diagnosis as the reference standard. Secondary Aims: Compare diagnostic characteristics of the colonoscopes, measure concordance of high confidence and accuracy, compare accuracy of predicted versus actual surveillance interval recommendations, perform a cost-effective analysis of endoscopic versus pathologic diagnoses, and measure complications.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 2011
End Date
October 2015
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Roy Soetikno

Co-Principal Investigator

VA Palo Alto Health Care System

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult patients referred for routine colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria

  • Known inflammatory bowel disease
  • Personal or family history of polyposis or non-polyposis syndrome
  • Presentation for emergency endoscopy
  • Inability to remove polyp due to coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Rate of Accurate High Confidence Polyp Histology Predictions by the Endoscopist in the Two Groups.

Time Frame: At the time of procedure

Measure of the percentage of accurate high confidence predictions by the endoscopist in the differentiation of neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions, using the high definition NBI colonoscopy with and without close focus features. High confidence was assigned if the polyp had one or more features of Type 2 (neoplasia) or Type 1 (nonneoplasia) in the NICE classification and no features associated with the other histology Note: one patient may have multiple polyps.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Learning Curve(At time of procedure.)
  • Cost(At the time of procedure)
  • Diagnostic Characteristics(At time of procedure)
  • Accuracy of Predicted Versus Actual Surveillance Intervals(At the time of procedure)

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials