Comparison between Mallampati Classification & Friedmans Tongue Positions for assessment before anaesthesia
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: 4- Measurement and Monitoring
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/06/054281
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Sohan Lal Solanki
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Open to Recruitment
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Adult patients posted for oncological procedures
Requiring laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation
Mouth Opening of at least 3 cm.
ASA I-III
Exclusion Criteria
Tongue Cancer
Ankyloglossia
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cormac-Lehane Grading during tracheal IntubationTimepoint: At the time of tracheal intubation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cormac-Lehane Grading during tracheal Intubation in Oral Cancer PatientsTimepoint: At the time of tracheal intubation;Correlation of higher Mallampatti Classification & higher Friedmanâ??s Tongue Position with requirement of video laryngoscope <br/ ><br>Timepoint: At the time of tracheal intubation;Inter-observer correlation between Mallampatti Classification evaluation <br/ ><br>and Friedmanâ??s Tongue Position evaluation <br/ ><br>Timepoint: During airway assessment.;Inter-observer variability of Cormac-Lehane Grading between 1st & 2nd (senior) operator during direct laryngoscopyTimepoint: At the time of tracheal intubation