MedPath

LIpid Lowering With Highly Potent Statins in Hyperlipidaemia With Type 2 Diabetes patiENts

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Hypercholesterolemia With Concomitant Type 2 Diabetes
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01544309
Lead Sponsor
Listen Trial Group
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on lipid lowering effect and glucose metabolism in hypercholesterolemia patients with diabetes mellitus.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1049
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Hypercholesterolemia patients

    • Patients who have not achieved the target control levels of LDL-C in the "Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2007"

  2. Type 2 diabetes patients

    • Patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and receiving diet therapy, exercise therapy, or medication
    • Patients who received constant therapy for three months before registration and have no plan for therapy change
    • Patients with kept HbA1c level (Japan Diabetes Society [JDS] level) of less than 7.0% (or, National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program [NGSP] level of less than 7.4%) within three months before registration
    • Patients receiving or not receiving medication at present
  3. Patients giving voluntary written consent to participate in the study

  4. Male or female patients at 20 years or older

Exclusion Criteria
  1. Patients who administered rosuvastatin, atorvastatin or ezetimibe within three month at the registration
  2. Patients with severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≥ 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] ≥ 110 mmHg)
  3. Patients with type 1 diabetes
  4. Patients judged to have familial hypercholesterolemia
  5. Patients with a serum triglyceride level of ≥ 400 mg/dL
  6. Patients who had the onset of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease within three months
  7. Patients with serious heart failure (NYHA classification III - IV)
  8. Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to statins
  9. Patients with a history of drug-induced myopathy
  10. Patients with severe complication of diabetes
  11. Patients receiving insulin
  12. Patients with serious liver or kidney disease
  13. Patients with serious concurrent disease such as malignancy, or patients with severely limited lifespan
  14. Patients who are or may be pregnant
  15. Patients judged by the investigators to be ineligible for participation in the study for any other reason

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Rosuvastatin administration groupRosuvastatin-
Atorvastatin administration groupAtorvastatin-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) LevelBaseline, and 12 months after administration
Change in HbA1c LevelBaseline, 12 months after administration
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in HbA1c LevelBaseline, 3, 6 months after administration and the end of study treatment (or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)
Percent Change in Insulin LevelBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment (or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)

An inverse relationship exists between mean change in insulin level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa.

Number of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration

"Deterioration of diabetic treatment status" is defined as addition of new drug, increase in dosage, drug changes (therapy intensification), and deterioration in HbA1c of \> 0.5%.

Percent Change in 1,5-AG LevelBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)

An inverse relationship exists between mean change in 1,5-AG level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa

Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusBaseline, 12 months after administration

"Deterioration of diabetic treatment status" is defined as addition of new drug, increase in dosage, drug changes (therapy intensification), and deterioration in HbA1c of \> 0.5%.

Percent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration, the end of starting dose and the end of study treatment
Percent Change in Non-HDL-C LevelBaseline, 3 and 6 months after administration, the end of starting dose and the end of study treatment
Frequency of Cardiovascular Events (Coronary Artery Disease, Heart Failure, Cerebrovascular Disease, Peripheral Artery Disease and Aortic Disease)From the start of the treatment to the end of study treatment
Percent Changes in Lipids and Inflammatory Marker (Hs-CRP) and Their CorrelationBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration, the end of starting dose and the end of study treatment

Correlation between percent changes in lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, TG, non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio, LDL-C/HDL-C ratio, TC and FFA) and inflammatory marker (hs-CRP)

Rate of Patients Who Have Reached the Target LDL-C Level Specified in Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines (JASGL) 20073 months after administration, the end of starting dose and the end of study treatment

Percentage of participants achieving the target LDL-C levels \<100 mg/dL for participants with history of coronary artery diseases (CAD) and \<120 mg/dL for participants without history of CAD are presented.

Change in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)
Change From Baseline in Insulin LevelBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment (or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)

An inverse relationship exists between mean change in insulin level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa

Change From Baseline in 1,5-AG LevelBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)

An inverse relationship exists between mean change in 1,5-AG level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa

Percent Change in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)
Frequency of Serious Adverse Events (SAE)Up to 12 months

Trial Locations

Locations (133)

Hiramitsu Heart Clinic

🇯🇵

Nagoya city, Aichi pref., Japan

Honjo Daiichi Hospital

🇯🇵

Yurihonjo city, Akita pref., Japan

Iryouhoujin Syadan Yanagisawakai Yanagisawa Iin

🇯🇵

Matsudo city, Chiba pref., Japan

Matsuno Medical Clinic

🇯🇵

Iyo gun, Ehime pref., Japan

Ishite Matsumoto Naika Junkanki Clinic

🇯🇵

Matsuyama city, Ehime pref., Japan

Ehime Medical CO OP Izumigawa Clinic

🇯🇵

Niihama city, Ehime pref., Japan

Fukui Chuoh Clinic

🇯🇵

Fukui city, Fukui pref., Japan

Fukuoka City Medical Association Hospital

🇯🇵

Fukuoka city, Fukuoka pref., Japan

Matsumoto Clinic

🇯🇵

Fukuoka city, Fukuoka pref., Japan

Saku Hospital

🇯🇵

Fukuoka city, Fukuoka pref., Japan

Scroll for more (123 remaining)
Hiramitsu Heart Clinic
🇯🇵Nagoya city, Aichi pref., Japan

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.