Comparison of clinical efficiency of two different functional appliances in treatment of retruded mandible.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/09/027942
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Keerti Kaushik
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1. Patients in CVMI staging 2,3,4
2. Class II Malocclusion (ANB >4o)
3. Horizontal or average growth pattern
4. Minimum crowding in dental arch
5. Positive Visual Treatment Objective (VTO)
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patients above CVMI staging 4
2. Class II Malocclusion (ANB <4 degrees)
3. Vertical growth pattern
4. crowding in dental arch
5. Negative Visual Treatment Objective (VTO)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To evaluate and compare the skeletal and dental changes produced by AdvanSync and Herbst appliance using CBCT.Timepoint: Six months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ILTimepoint: NI