MedPath

Comparison of Patient Satisfaction Between Conventional and Digital Removable Partial Dentures

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Partially Edentulous Patients
Registration Number
NCT07228988
Lead Sponsor
King Abdulaziz University
Brief Summary

Study type: cross over within subject clinical trial Primary aim: To compare patient satisfaction among three different RPDs: conventional cast Co-Cr, 3D-printed Co-Cr, and PEEK RPDs.

Secondary aim: To evaluate the impact of these RPDs on oral health-related quality of life and patient preference among these RPDs

Detailed Description

A within-subject randomized crossover clinical was conducted at the Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University after obtaining an ethical approvalfrom the Faculty Ethical Committee. All patients have signed a consent before being enrolled in the study.

Each participant received three RPDs using three manufacturing techniques (conventional cast Co-Cr, 3D-printed Co-Cr, and milled PEEK) fabricated to the same RPD design specifications. Each RPD worn for 30 days with a one-week washout period between the trial phases.

Participants were selected from partially edentulous patients fulfilling mandibular Kennedy Class I with the first or second premolars as the last abutment teeth bilaterally . Inclusion criteria include good oral hygiene, healthy mucosa, and absence of systemic diseases affecting oral tissues. Exclusion criteria include allergy to materials, poor compliance, or history of temporomandibular disorders.

Sample size estimation is based on detecting a moderate effect size (f = 0.25) with 80% power and α = 0.05, requiring at least 30 participants. To account for possible dropouts, a total of 36 patients was recruited.

Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Visual Analogue Grade (VAG) scale (0-100 mm). The VAG evaluates satisfaction domains such as comfort, esthetics, speech, and mastication, while OHIP-14 measures the impact of oral health on quality of life through 14 questions covering 7 domains. At the end of all the treatment phases participants determined the most preferred denture by answering single choice question of the best overall denture among the three types.

Results will be statistically analysed using one ANOVA test and Tukeys test if the difference between groups is significant

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
36
Inclusion Criteria

- Partially edentulous patients with mandibular Kennedy class I, last abutment is the first or second premolars, maxillary arch is dentate or restored, good oral hygiene

Exclusion Criteria
  • Any systemic diseases that affect oral health, periodontal disease, improper patient compliance, TMD

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Patient satisfaction using VAGDelivery of the first denture type 1st questionnaire 30 days after receiving the first denture 7 days wash out Delivery of the second denture type 2nd questionnaire 30 days after using the denture 7 days wash out Final questionnaire after 30 days

Visual Analogue Grade 100 mm scale is used to measure patient satisfaction and comfort as zero indicates the worst and 100 indicates the best response

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Oral Health related Quality of Life OHRQoLDelivery of the first denture type 1st questionnaire 30 days after receiving the first denture 7 days wash out Delivery of the second denture type 2nd questionnaire 30 days after using the denture 7 days wash out Final questionnaire after 30 days

OHIP-14 questionnaire is used to assess the OHRQol

Patient preferenceAfter all the three dentures treatment phase 30 days after the delivery of the last denture according to sequence randomisation Study time line was 6 months from recruitment to final questionnaire

Single short end question to select one type of denture that was preferred by the patient after using all the three types

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Faulty of dentistry King Adbulaziz University-KAU

🇸🇦

Jeddah, Western, Saudi Arabia

King Adbulaziz University-KAU

🇸🇦

Jeddah, Westren, Saudi Arabia

Faulty of dentistry King Adbulaziz University-KAU
🇸🇦Jeddah, Western, Saudi Arabia

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.