Comparing of unilateral vs bilateral spinal anaesthesia technique for arthroscopic knee surgery
Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- ASA physical status 1 and 2
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/03/012406
- Lead Sponsor
- A
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Closed to Recruitment of Participants
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1.ASA-PS I
2.Age 20-50 years
3.Patients posted for arthroscopic knee surgery under subarachnoid block
Exclusion Criteria
1.Patients who could not lie down in lateral position
2.Patients who will require GA during surgery
3.Patients who do not consent for a subarachnoid anaesthesia
4.Patients with coagulopathy, hypovolaemia, BMI > 35 kg/m2, spinal abnormalities
5.Patients with chronic use of sedatives or antidepressants
6.Patients with history of regular alcohol consumption
7.Patients with local infection over the lumbar spine
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Onset time of sensory and motor block in two groups <br/ ><br>2.Level of sensory block <br/ ><br>3.Comparing hemodynamic perturbationsTimepoint: After giving Spinal Anaesthesia <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method eed of anticholinergics, vasopressors, fluids <br/ ><br>Time to recovery from the neuraxial blockade <br/ ><br>Time to urinary retention <br/ ><br>Time to first analgesic requirement <br/ ><br>Timepoint: Intraopearive and postoperative period