CTRI/2016/10/007374已完成未知
Comparison of I-gel vs LMA Proseal as airway for laproscopic hernioplasty
Dr Richa Gupta0 个研究点目标入组 60 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 60
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •body weight 40-60kgs
排除标准
- •Obese patients,known difficult airway, mouth opening <2.5 fingers, cervical spine disease, patients prone to aspiration such as hiatus hernia and GERD and emergency surgeries. Patients with systemic illness.Those patients who does not give consent to be part of the study are excluded from the study.
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
3 期
Comparing I-gel versus LMA Proseal regarding airway management in controlled hypertensive patients.CTRI/2019/05/018929Tanuka Mandal
尚未招募
1 期
Comparison between Two supraglottic airway devices in anaesthetized patients on spontaneous ventilation during daycare proceduresventilation during daycare proceduresCTRI/2020/09/028146Department of Anaesthesiology
招募中
不适用
A clinical trial to study the effects of two devices I Gel and LMA Proseal in patients undergoing Laparoscopic Gall Bladder Removal SurgeryCTRI/2021/02/031589Shri guru ram rai institute of medical health and sciences Post graduate
尚未招募
Unknown
Comparison of I-gel airway vs SLIPA 2G airway in paediatric paitents undergoing general anaesthesia with caudal epidural anaesthesiaCTRI/2023/07/055820yashashvi chouhan
已完成
不适用
Comparision of two supraglottic airway devices ( I-Gel and PLMA) for pediatric anaesthesiaCTRI/2017/09/009705Department of Anaesthesia64