MedPath

Laryngeal Mask Insertion Conditions And Hemodynamic Effects

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Laryngeal Masks
Interventions
Drug: placebo
Drug: Ketamine
Registration Number
NCT03257800
Lead Sponsor
Leila mansali stambouli
Brief Summary

This interventional double-blind, randomized trial has included120 children of American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status I or II aged between 1and 8 years of either sex, scheduled for outpatient minor surgery under general anesthesia.This study examined whether co-induction with ketamine-propofol enhance laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion conditions and preserve hemodynamic state in patients.

Detailed Description

This study aims to compare two anesthesia protocols: propofol induction with or without a prior injection of ketamine, in term of LMA insertion conditions(favorable= satisfactory or unfavorable= unsatisfactory ) and hemodynamic effects (decrease of 20 % from baseline of blood pressure and heart rate).

The conditions of LMA insertion have been assessed in each study group by an experimented anesthesiologist, who was unaware of the treatment group assignment. Conditions were considered satisfactory, if the 4 following criteria were acceptable: the jaw was relaxed, there was no coughing, swallowing and no limb movement, and then the LMA was inserted. When the investigators save at least one unacceptable of these criteria, conditions were considered to be unsatisfactory and thereafter anesthesia was deepened with supplemental dose of propofol 1mg.kg-¹ and 1 minute later a reinsertion was attempted. The total number of attempts at LMA insertion was recorded. Children trachea was intubated after 3 failed attempts of LMA insertion, and then patient was excluded.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria
  • ASA physical status I or II who were scheduled to minor elective ambulatory surgery (e.g. inguinal hernia, undescended testes, umbilical hernia) performed by experienced surgeon under general anesthesia.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • patients with full stomach
  • A history of gastric reflux
  • A history of convulsions, cardiovascular or neuromuscular disease
  • Allergies to the study drugs
  • obese children
  • suspected difficult airway and hyper-reactive airway disease
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
propofol groupplacebo0,9% saline solution ( Placebo ) at the same volume as ketamine (50mg/ml) was injected intravenously 1min prior propofol 3 mg.kg-1 and 1 min before LMA insertion in propofol group. sevoflurane 6-7% was used on vaporizer setting with 50% nitrous oxide in oxgen prior intravenous anesthesia. The loss of eyelash reflex was considered as the desired end point for induction.
ketamine-propofol groupKetamineKetamine (50mg/ml) at 0.5 mg.kg-1 was injected intravenously 1min prior 3 mgkg-1 of propofol and 1 min before LMA insertion in Ketamine-propofol group. sevoflurane 6-7% was used on vaporizer setting with 50% nitrous oxide in oxgen prior intravenous anesthesia. The loss of eyelash reflex was considered as the desired end point for induction.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
LMA insertion conditions2 minutes

satisfactory conditions of LMA insertion are defined as when 4 criteria were acceptable: jaw relaxation, no coughing or swallowing and no limb movement.

unsatisfactory conditions of LMA insertion is defined as when there's at least one unacceptable of these criteria

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
hemodynamic effectsfrom Baseline period until 10 minutes after LMA insertion

mean blood pressure (MAP) in mmHg . Heart Rate (HR) in beats per minute (time frame: from baseline to LMA insertion)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Hospital of Fattouma Bourguiba

🇹🇳

Monastir, Tunisia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath