Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04574037
NCT04574037
Recruiting
Not Applicable

Prediction of Post-stroke Motor Recovery: the PREP-AVC Algorithm

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris1 site in 1 country200 target enrollmentApril 21, 2021

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Stroke
Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Enrollment
200
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Accuracy of classification with the PREP2 decision tree
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The prediction of motor recovery in the acute phase of stroke is crucial for several clinical reasons: (i) informing the patient and his relatives, (ii) helping to identify the patient's endorsement (return home or rehabilitation) as well as the adaptation of the rehabilitation program to what can be expected from it. To date, an algorithm (decision tree) proposed by C. Stinear's team named PREP2 is the best predictive tool with 75% of patients well classified at 3 months. It predicts the functional recovery of the upper limb after stroke 3 months before the episode by categorizing recovery as "excellent", "good", "limited" as well as "minor" (poor). With two data (SAFE score, age) or three (SAFE score, Motor evoked potential, NIHSS), the prediction is effective three times out of 4. In the study the team is proposing "PREP-UCV", it would like to validate this algorithm as it is with patients in the active file who are victims of stroke. The expected accuracy is 75% or more. As a secondary objective, the team would like to confirm that it find the same algorithm starting from the initial data from PREP 2 (side of the stroke, type of stroke (ischemic and / or hemorrhagic), involvement of the corticospinal tract on MRI, sex at birth ) as well as two other factors which are also very important: cognitive status (dysexecutive / aphasia / neglect), as well as the neutrophils on lymphocytes ratio.

Detailed Description

Retrospective cohort of stroke patients with a upper limb deficit.Clinical scores such as SAFE score, NIHSS; demographic data such as age and electrophysiological data (such as the absence/presence of Motor evoked potential) will determine the predictive functional outcome of the upper limb deficit according to the PREP2 algorithm. The accuracy of this prediction will be verified according to the actual state of the patient at 3-6 months. Second, another algorithm will be built taking in account cognitive deficits and biological data to determine if the accuracy is higher. All data will be acquired during the clinical routine work-up.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 21, 2021
End Date
October 1, 2027
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Accuracy of classification with the PREP2 decision tree

Time Frame: 6 months

Proportion of patients well classified in their group of recovery

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials