MedPath

Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Oliceridine Versus Morphine or Sufentanil for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Surgeries: a Randomized Control Trial

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Sufentanil
Morphine
Validity
Safety
Oliceridine
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT06990893
Lead Sponsor
Anqing Municipal Hospital
Brief Summary

Objective: To compare the application of oxelidine in postoperative analgesia after orthopedic lumbar spine surgery with morphine or sufentanil, and to explore the efficacy and safety of postoperative analgesia.

Method: Researchers included 90 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical conditions I and III, aged 18 to 65 years, who were scheduled to undergo orthopedic lumbar general anesthesia surgery at an appropriate time. The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups, with 30 cases in each group: The oxeridine group (Group A), where a loading dose of 1.5mg of oxeridine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.01mg/kg-1.h-1 was connected. Oxeridine was mixed with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml/h. Morphine group (Group M), a loading dose of 4mg of morphine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03mg.kg-1.h-1 morphine was connected with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml/h. Sufentanil group (Group S), a 4u loading dose of sufentanil was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03ug.kg-1.h-1 was connected. Sufentanil was combined with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml/h.The resting and exercise VAS pain scores of the three groups of patients at 30 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after the operation and adverse reactions within 48 hours were recorded.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
90
Inclusion Criteria
  • Lumbar spine surgery with ASA grades I-III
  • Aged 18-65 years
  • Ethically, the patient voluntarily accepted this trial and signed the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
  • Severe respiratory and circulatory system diseases
  • Nervous system disease
  • Mental and psychological disorders
  • Abnormal liver and kidney functions
  • Participated in another drug clinical research within the past 30 days

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
The sufentanil group(S)SufentanilA loading dose of 4ug of sufentanil was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03ug.kg-1.h-1 was connected. Sufentanil was mixed with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml per hour
The oliceridine group(A)OliceridineA loading dose of 1.5mg of oliceridine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.01 mg.kg-1.h-1 orselidine was connected and diluted with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml per hour
The morphine group(M)MorphineA loading dose of 4mg of morphine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump was connected to 0.03mg.kg-1.h-1 morphine mixed with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml per hour
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The VAS pain scores at rest and during exercise of the three groups of patients after the operationat 30 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after the operation
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Anqing Hospital Anesthesiology

🇨🇳

Anqing, Anhui, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath