Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Oliceridine Versus Morphine or Sufentanil for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Surgeries: a Randomized Control Trial
- Conditions
- SufentanilMorphineValiditySafetyOliceridine
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT06990893
- Lead Sponsor
- Anqing Municipal Hospital
- Brief Summary
Objective: To compare the application of oxelidine in postoperative analgesia after orthopedic lumbar spine surgery with morphine or sufentanil, and to explore the efficacy and safety of postoperative analgesia.
Method: Researchers included 90 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical conditions I and III, aged 18 to 65 years, who were scheduled to undergo orthopedic lumbar general anesthesia surgery at an appropriate time. The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups, with 30 cases in each group: The oxeridine group (Group A), where a loading dose of 1.5mg of oxeridine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.01mg/kg-1.h-1 was connected. Oxeridine was mixed with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml/h. Morphine group (Group M), a loading dose of 4mg of morphine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03mg.kg-1.h-1 morphine was connected with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml/h. Sufentanil group (Group S), a 4u loading dose of sufentanil was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03ug.kg-1.h-1 was connected. Sufentanil was combined with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml/h.The resting and exercise VAS pain scores of the three groups of patients at 30 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after the operation and adverse reactions within 48 hours were recorded.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 90
- Lumbar spine surgery with ASA grades I-III
- Aged 18-65 years
- Ethically, the patient voluntarily accepted this trial and signed the informed consent form
- Severe respiratory and circulatory system diseases
- Nervous system disease
- Mental and psychological disorders
- Abnormal liver and kidney functions
- Participated in another drug clinical research within the past 30 days
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description The sufentanil group(S) Sufentanil A loading dose of 4ug of sufentanil was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03ug.kg-1.h-1 was connected. Sufentanil was mixed with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml per hour The oliceridine group(A) Oliceridine A loading dose of 1.5mg of oliceridine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.01 mg.kg-1.h-1 orselidine was connected and diluted with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml per hour The morphine group(M) Morphine A loading dose of 4mg of morphine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump was connected to 0.03mg.kg-1.h-1 morphine mixed with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml per hour
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The VAS pain scores at rest and during exercise of the three groups of patients after the operation at 30 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after the operation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Department of Anqing Hospital Anesthesiology
🇨🇳Anqing, Anhui, China