Impact of Frequency-specific Subthalamic Nucleus Subregion Stimulation on Inhibitory Control in Parkinson's Disease

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Parkinson Disease; Deep Brain Stimulation

• Registration Number: NCT07022522
• Lead Sponsor: Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Brief Summary

The core symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) include both motor and non-motor symptoms. Cognitive impairment is one of the most common non-motor symptoms in PD patients, with approximately 30% of patients exhibiting cognitive dysfunction at diagnosis and up to 80% eventually progressing to dementia. Among these, impairment of inhibitory control is the most detrimental cognitive dysfunction, as patients with compromised inhibitory control have difficulty suppressing impulsive behaviors and maintaining attention, which severely reduces their quality of life.

The subthalamic nucleus (STN) plays an important role in the development and progression of PD. Along its longitudinal axis from posterior to anterior, it can be divided into three subregions: motor, associative, and limbic. The motor subregion receives extensive projections from the motor cortex and serves as a core node in the PD motor network, participating in the coordination and control of motor function. The associative subregion receives widespread projections from the prefrontal cortex and serves as a core node in the cognitive control network, regulating cognitive processes such as inhibitory control, set-shifting, and working memory.

High-frequency (\>100Hz) deep brain stimulation of the STN (STN-DBS) is a well-established effective treatment for mid-to-late stage PD and can significantly improve motor symptoms. However, long-term high-frequency stimulation may exacerbate cognitive impairment. Recent studies have shown that low-frequency (4-10Hz) STN-DBS can improve cognitive functions such as working memory and verbal fluency in PD patients, but research on its effects in the domain of inhibitory control is lacking. Moreover, different STN subregions are involved in regulating distinct functions, yet previous studies have not differentiated the effects of stimulation targeting specific STN subregions.

Therefore, conducting in-depth research on the effects of different stimulation frequencies applied to distinct STN subregions on inhibitory control function in PD patients is of great significance for exploring ways to improve cognitive impairment in PD and enhance the clinical individualized therapeutic effects of STN-DBS. This study plans to perform high- and low-frequency electrical stimulation of different STN subregions in PD patients who have undergone routine bilateral STN-DBS surgery, collect behavioral indicators during inhibitory control tasks (Arrow Flanker and Stop-Signal) under different stimulation conditions, and through comparative analysis, identify the specific stimulation sites and frequencies that can effectively improve inhibitory control function in PD patients.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2024-10-01
• Status Verified: 2025-03
• Study First Submitted: 2025-05-29
• Study First Submitted QC: 2025-06-07
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-06-07
• Study First Posted: 2025-06-15
• Last Update Posted: 2025-06-15
• Primary Completion: 2026-02-01
• Study Completion: 2026-12-31

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 20

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 40-80 years old;
2. Diagnosed with idiopathic Parkinson's disease;
3. Meeting the indications for DBS surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient declined to participate in the study;
2. Presence of significant post-DBS complications (e.g., intracranial hemorrhage, cerebral edema, electrode misplacement);
3. Significant psychiatric disorders or dementia (MMSE score <20 for uneducated; <23 for 1-6 years education; <27 for ≥7 years education);
4. Visual or auditory impairment affecting cognitive task performance
5. History of conditions potentially impairing cognitive function.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: CROSSOVER

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Behavioral paradigm results	Outcome measures were assessed starting at 5 minutes after each stimulation condition	1. Arrow Flanker Task : Reaction time for congruent and incongruent trials.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Behavioral paradigm results	Outcome measures were assessed starting at 5 minutes after each stimulation condition	Stop-Signal Task: Stop-signal reaction time (SSRT).
Motor score	Outcome measures were assessed starting at 5 minutes after each stimulation condition	MDS-UPDRS III score: The Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (MDS-UPDRS III) is a standardized clinical assessment tool for evaluating motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). The total score ranges from 0 to 132, with higher scores indicating more severe motor dysfunction, including increased rigidity, bradykinesia (slowed movement), tremor, and postural instability. Conversely, lower scores reflect milder or absent motor impairments, suggesting better motor function and symptom control.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University; 🇨🇳 Beijing, Beijing, China