MedPath

Awake-Prone Positioning Strategy for Hypoxic Patients With COVID-19

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Respiratory Failure
Covid19
Interventions
Other: Usual Care
Other: APPS
Registration Number
NCT04547283
Lead Sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Brief Summary

This study aims to determine if a strategy of recommending prone (on stomach) positioning of patients positive or suspected positive for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring supplemental oxygen, but not mechanically ventilated, Is feasible in the inpatient setting. This study will be performed as a pragmatic pilot clinical trial to gain information relevant to the future conduct of a larger trial.

Detailed Description

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, has rapidly led to significant morbidity and mortality worldwide, primarily through lower respiratory tract involvement progressing from hypoxemia to acute respiratory distress syndrome. Novel approaches to improving oxygenation are urgently needed to limit aerosolization concerns and resource scarcity associated with intubation and, to a lesser extent, other forms of advanced respiratory support.

Prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure has been associated with improvement in oxygenation and mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The prone position appears to provide more uniform lung perfusion, shifting ventilation to well-perfused lung segments and recruitment of dependent atelectatic regions of lung. Physiological alterations associated with the prone position would foreseeably also apply to spontaneously breathing patients and evidence from small observational studies suggests that prone positioning in non-intubated patients is feasible associated with improvement in oxygenation. However, it remains unknown if a prone ventilation strategy is truly beneficial for non-intubated hypoxic Covid-19 patients, and this question has stimulated interest in the conduct of rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCT).

However, the awake prone strategy is a complex medical intervention with multiple implementation nuances such as adoption, feasibility, and tolerability that may affect successful conduct of a definitive RCT. In order to increase the likelihood of a successful future RCT, the investigators will conduct the APPS pilot study. The overall aim of the APPS pilot trial was to assess feasibility and important contextual factors for a large RCT to compare the clinical effectiveness of an Awake-Prone Positioning Strategy (APPS) for respiratory support versus usual care alone for hypoxic adults with Covid-19.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • hospitalized patients with positive COVID testing during hospitalization or 7 days prior OR Hospitalized with suspected COVID pneumonia
  • room air oxygen saturation <93% or oxygen requirement > or equal to 3 Liters per minute
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • unable to turn self, spinal instability, facial or pelvic fractures, open chest or open abdomen, altered mental status, anticipated difficult airway, show signs of respiratory fatigue, or receiving end-of-life care
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Usual CareUsual CareParticipants randomized to this arm will remain in their clinician's team standard practice and their natural choice of position, which is anticipated to favor a supine (rather than prone) position.
Awake-Prone Positioning StrategyAPPSParticipants randomized to this arm will receive guidance from their Inpatient treatment team to assume the prone position for as much time as is tolerable during hospitalization.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time spent with S/F ratio < 31548 hours from eligibility

Time spent with oxygenation saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio less than 315

Average S/F ratio48 hours from eligibility

Average oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Hospital length of staythrough study completion, Up to 30 days

Number of days from hospital admission to discharge

Number of patients requiring ICU admission during study period48 hours from eligibility

Number of patients requiring ICU admission during study period

Number of patients experiencing who die prior to dischargethrough study completion, Up to 30 days

Number of patients who die prior to hospital discharge

Number of patients requiring intubation48 hours From eligibility

Number of patients requiring intubation

Highest oxygen support48 hours from eligibility

Highest level of supplemental oxygen required

Number of patients requiring ICU admission during hospitalizationthrough study completion, Up to 30 days

Number of patients requiring ICU admission during hospitalization

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Carolinas Medical Center

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Β© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath