Comparison of the analgesic effect for puncture between EMLA and Penless.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- The cases who receive general anesthesia or epidural anesthesia.
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000020998
- Lead Sponsor
- Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Anesthesiology
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot yet recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
Inclusion Criteria
The patients who receive general anesthesia.
ASA-PS (American Society of Anesthesiologists - Physical Status) 1 or 2.
Exclusion Criteria
?Past history of allergy for local anesthetics.
?Past history of contact dermatitis for ointment.
?Severe hepatic, renal or cardiovascular disease.
?Dermal abnormality on the puncture site.
?Methemogulobinemia
?Porphyria
?Sensory disturbance
?Pregnancy or lactation period
?Anesthesiologist determine that the patient is inappropriate for this study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for the pain of puncture
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), adverse event (cutaneous symptoms and local anesthetic toxicity)