MedPath

Midline vs. Paramedian Approaches for US-assisted Spinal Anesthesia

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Anesthesia, Spinal
Ultrasonography
Interventions
Procedure: ultrasound-assisted midline approach
Procedure: ultrasound-assisted paramedian approach
Registration Number
NCT03491943
Lead Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Brief Summary

Ultrasound has emerged as an useful tool for neuraxial blockade. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety between the midline approach and paramedian approach for ultrasound-assisted spinal anesthesia in adult patients.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
112
Inclusion Criteria
  • Adult patients scheduled to undergoing elective orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia, with ASA physical status classification I, II, III
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with contraindication to spinal anesthesia (coagulopathy, local infection, allergy to local anesthetic)
  • Patients with morbid cardiac diseases
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients with previous history of lumbar spinal surgery
  • Patients with anatomical abnormality of lumbar spine

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Midline groupultrasound-assisted midline approachPreprocedural ultrasound-assisted midline approach of spinal anesthesia will be performed. 0.5% heavy bupivacaine will be injected to intrathecal space for spinal anesthesia.
Paramedian groupultrasound-assisted paramedian approachPreprocedural ultrasound-assisted paramedian approach of spinal anesthesia will be performed. 0.5% heavy bupivacaine will be injected to intrathecal space for spinal anesthesia.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
the number of needle passesIntraoperative (from the first insertion of needle to patient's skin, until the completion of spinal anesthetic injection)

the number of forward advancements of the spinal needle in a given interspinous space, i.e., withdrawal and redirection of spinal needle without exiting the skin

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of spinal needle insertion attemptsIntraoperative (from the first insertion of needle to patient's skin, until the completion of spinal anesthetic injection)

the number of times the spinal needle was withdrawn from the skin and reinserted

Incidence of radicular pain, paraesthesia, and blood tapping in the spinal needleIntraoperative (from the first insertion of needle, until the completion of spinal anesthetic injection)

Incidence of radicular pain, paraesthesia, and blood tapping in the spinal needle during the spinal anesthesia procedure

Time for identifying landmarksintraoperative (time taken for establish the landmark, from start of US scanning to completion of scanning

time from placement of the ultrasound probe on the skin to the completion of markings.

Time taken for performing spinal anestheticIntraoperative (from insertion of the needle to the completion of injection)

time from needle insertion to the completion of injection

dermatome level of sensory block20 minutes after the completion of spinal anesthetic injection

thoracic dermatome level of sensory block assessed by loss of cold sensation tested with 2% chlorhexidine swab

Periprocedural painPatients will be asked immediately after the completion of spinal anesthesia

11-point verbal rating scale (0=no pain, 10=most pain imaginable)

Periprocedural discomfort scorePatients will be asked immediately after the completion of spinal anesthesia

11-point verbal rating scale (0=no discomfort, 10=most discomfort imaginable)

Patient satisfaction score of spinal anesthesia procedurePatients will be asked immediately after the completion of spinal anesthesia

11-point verbal rating scale (0=very unsatisfied, 10=very satisfied)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Seoul National University Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath