跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02790567
NCT02790567已完成不适用

Evaluation of Automated Immunoassay, Particle Gel Immunoassay and Pretest Scoring Systems (4Ts and HEP Scores) in the Diagnosis of Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia in Surgical Critically Ill Patients

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 120 人开始时间: 2012年10月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
120
试验地点
1
主要终点
Sensibility, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of HEP score for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

研究概览

简要总结

The early diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is particularly difficult in surgical critically ill patients. If the use of rapid immunological diagnostic methods and pretest scoring systems has been proposed in the medical intensive care unit (ICU), none of these methods have been specifically evaluated in the diagnosis of HIT in surgical patients.

详细描述

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is of concern in critically ill patients, given the high prevalence of heparin use. The diagnosis of HIT in surgical intensive care unit (ICU) is problematic due to the lack of reliable diagnostic method. No gold standard currently exists and the definitive diagnosis is mainly based on the detection of heparin-dependent platelet-activating antibodies by ELISA method, on the platelet serotonin release assay (SRA) and on the changes of the blood platelet count after the discontinuation of heparin therapy. As a result, no early definitive diagnosis could be done. This could expose patients to thrombotic complications related to the HIT or hemorrhagic complications related to the alternative anticoagulant prescribed. This complications can threaten the prognosis of these patients. Particle gel immunoassay and automated immunoassay has been proposed for the early diagnosis of HIT in medical critically ill and non-critically ill patients. Many authors suggest that the accuracy of these immunological methods for the diagnosis of HIT could be altered in surgical patients, but these tests has never been specifically evaluated in this population. The 4Ts and the HIT Expert Probability (HEP) score systems sound interesting for the diagnosis of HIT. These clinicobiological scores can be easily used by non-expert clinicians, but have also never been evaluated in the surgical ICU.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age > 18 years old
  • Diagnosis of HIT suspected
  • Admitted in our surgical intensive care unit during the study period

排除标准

  • Age < 18 years old
  • Pregnancy and/or breast feeding
  • Fondaparinux anticoagulation
  • Withdrawal of consent

结局指标

主要结局

Sensibility, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of HEP score for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

时间窗: during the ICU stay, i.e an average time of 10 days

次要结局

  • Sensibility, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the 4Ts score for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)(during the ICU stay, i.e an average time of 10 days)
  • Sensibility, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the automated immunoassay HemosIL-Ab latex agglutination test for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)(during the ICU stay, i.e an average time of 10 days)
  • Sensibility, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the particul gel immunoassay ID-PaGia test for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)(during the ICU stay, i.e an average time of 10 days)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验