A Randomized Comparison of LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway) Supreme and LMA Proseal in Infants Below 10kg
- Conditions
- Laryngeal Mask Airway
- Interventions
- Device: LMA SupremeDevice: LMA Proseal
- Registration Number
- NCT02478983
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Malaya
- Brief Summary
The investigators conduct this study to evaluate the clinical efficacy of size 1 and 1.5 supreme LMA compared to proseal LMA for infants weighing \<10kg.
- Detailed Description
This is a randomized prospective study to compare the clinical efficacy and safety for size 1 and 1.5 LMA supreme and LMA Proseal. The airway leak pressure of these 2 devices will be compared and other parameters such as time to insertion, insertion success rate, fibreoptic glottic view and intraoperative complications will be recorded.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Weight of < 10kg
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I-II
- Infants undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia using supraglottic airway device.
- Informed consent obtained from parents.
- ASA III-IV and emergency surgery
- Neonates and ex-premature babies with post conceptual age <55 weeks.
- Infants with history of difficult airway.
- Infants with features of difficult intubation.
- Active upper respiratory tract infection
- Infants with pulmonary disease
- Infants with history of gastroesophageal reflux disease
- Infants with risks of regurgitation and aspiration.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description LMA Supreme LMA Supreme 1 arm will receive LMA supreme for airway management LMA Proseal LMA Proseal 1 arm will receive LMA Proseal for airway management
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Oropharyngeal leak pressure intraoperative The measurement of oropharyngeal airway pressure when airway leak occurred
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Fibreoptic glottis view intraoperative Fibreoptic glottis view will be recorded according to a grading system
Time to insertion intraoperative Time from picking up the supraglottic airway device to the first detection of capnography square wave
Insertion success rate intraoperative The number of attempts for successful placement of the supraglottic airway is recorded.
Intraoperative complications intraoperative Complications such as loss of airway patency, desaturation, regurgitation of gastric contents, laryngospasm, bronchospasm and airway trauma will be recorded
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya
🇲🇾Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Malaysia