MedPath

A Randomized Comparison of LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway) Supreme and LMA Proseal in Infants Below 10kg

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Laryngeal Mask Airway
Interventions
Device: LMA Supreme
Device: LMA Proseal
Registration Number
NCT02478983
Lead Sponsor
University of Malaya
Brief Summary

The investigators conduct this study to evaluate the clinical efficacy of size 1 and 1.5 supreme LMA compared to proseal LMA for infants weighing \<10kg.

Detailed Description

This is a randomized prospective study to compare the clinical efficacy and safety for size 1 and 1.5 LMA supreme and LMA Proseal. The airway leak pressure of these 2 devices will be compared and other parameters such as time to insertion, insertion success rate, fibreoptic glottic view and intraoperative complications will be recorded.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • Weight of < 10kg
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I-II
  • Infants undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia using supraglottic airway device.
  • Informed consent obtained from parents.
Exclusion Criteria
  • ASA III-IV and emergency surgery
  • Neonates and ex-premature babies with post conceptual age <55 weeks.
  • Infants with history of difficult airway.
  • Infants with features of difficult intubation.
  • Active upper respiratory tract infection
  • Infants with pulmonary disease
  • Infants with history of gastroesophageal reflux disease
  • Infants with risks of regurgitation and aspiration.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
LMA SupremeLMA Supreme1 arm will receive LMA supreme for airway management
LMA ProsealLMA Proseal1 arm will receive LMA Proseal for airway management
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Oropharyngeal leak pressureintraoperative

The measurement of oropharyngeal airway pressure when airway leak occurred

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Fibreoptic glottis viewintraoperative

Fibreoptic glottis view will be recorded according to a grading system

Time to insertionintraoperative

Time from picking up the supraglottic airway device to the first detection of capnography square wave

Insertion success rateintraoperative

The number of attempts for successful placement of the supraglottic airway is recorded.

Intraoperative complicationsintraoperative

Complications such as loss of airway patency, desaturation, regurgitation of gastric contents, laryngospasm, bronchospasm and airway trauma will be recorded

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya

🇲🇾

Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Malaysia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath