Screening of Colorectal Cancer in the Public Healthcare Sector in Argentina

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Colorectal Neoplasms

• Registration Number: NCT04293315
• Lead Sponsor: Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy

Brief Summary

Introduction: Early detection of certain types of cancer significantly increases the likelihood of successful treatment and reduces mortality from these causes. However, the use of screening and the early detection of selected tumors such as colorectal cancer (CRC) are lower than those expected in our country. The objective of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of a multicomponent strategy that improves the screening and early detection of CRC in the population at risk of Primary Health Care Clinics (PCCs) of the public health system.

Population: people leaving in the catchment area of 10 selected primary care clinics from the public health system in the province of Mendoza, Argentina.

Design and methods: a Randomized clinical study by clusters. 10 PCCs will be included: 5 will be randomly assigned to receive an intervention to increase the CRC screening rates (improvement cycles) and 5 to the control arm (usual care). 150 participants will be included in each PCCs, in total, 1500 participants.

Intervention: An innovative vision is proposed, which combines a participatory and dynamic methodology based on improvement cycles. This approach includes the implementation of participatory learning sessions for health providers, involving the effectors of the design of the intervention. In the intervention branch at least 3 workshops (sessions) will be held with the members of the care system, in order to identify opportunities for improvement oriented to the design and application of an innovative intervention based on best practices. Each one of the sessions will constitute an analysis of the improvement cycle, following the following steps: 1) Selection of participants of the initial workshop; 2) Development of work model based on bibliographic review and initial qualitative phase; 3) Initial workshop with effectors for training in continuous improvement, objectives, interventions and data collection; 4) Learning workshops to discuss results, applicability of interventions and modifications to the work plan; 5) Closing session to evaluate preliminary results and discuss continuity of interventions beyond the project.

Outcomes: 1) Percentage of the population at risk that completes the screening; 2) Percentage of the population classified as at habitual risk or increased by risk factors.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2018-06-09
• Status Verified: 2019-04
• Study First Submitted: 2020-01-31
• Study First Submitted QC: 2020-03-01
• Last Update Submitted: 2020-03-01
• Study First Posted: 2020-03-03
• Last Update Posted: 2020-03-03
• Primary Completion: 2020-03-15
• Study Completion: 2020-03-15

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 1520

Inclusion Criteria

• Subjects who have public health coverage
• Age between 50 and 75 years old
• Residence in the catchment area of the PCCs
• With an indication to perform screening for CRC with FOBT
• People who consent to participate

Exclusion Criteria

• People who are bedridden.
• People who plan to move in the next 3 months.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Effective Screening	3 months	Proportion of participants who with known result of the FOBT within 90 days from recruitment. The investigators will review National Information System Registry to count the number of participants in each arm with a known result for their FOBT. The investigators will calculate the proportion of participants with known result (Effective Screening) in each arm of the study.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Proportion of positive FOBT referred for colonoscopy	3 months	The investigators will calculate the proportion of participants with a positive result in the FOBT that were referred to receive colonoscopy.
Implementation outcomes according to the RE-AIM framework	3 months	Implementation outcomes are: Reach, Effective implementation, adoption, implementation fidelity and maintenance
Proportion of participants with inadequate FOBT	3 months	The investigators will register the number of cases in each arm where the result of the FOBT is unknown because the test was inadequate, that is, the test could not be read.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ministry of Health; 🇦🇷 Mendoza, Argentina