Learning Lab for Diagnostic Fidelity
- Conditions
- Critical Illness
- Registration Number
- NCT03865303
- Lead Sponsor
- Mayo Clinic
- Brief Summary
Diagnostic error and delay remain a leading cause of preventable harm and death in the United States. Using a learning laboratory structure, researchers will implement mixed-methods research approaches to identify the systemic weaknesses that contribute to diagnostic error and delay in the hospital setting. The knowledge gained from research innovative will allow researchers to design, develop, implement, and refined a suite of human-centered tools that can be deployed to reduce the risk of diagnostic error and delay in both community and academic hospital settings.
- Detailed Description
Despite the recognition that diagnostic errors an delays are a major contributor to preventable deaths in the USA, little progress has been made to reduce mortality outcomes from this known killer. An effective strategy leading to meaningful reduction in diagnostic error and delay rates has not made its way into practice. This proposal is unique and novel and combines mixed-methods research approaches with systems engineering research approaches to understand the interplay of the multiple factors contributing to diagnostic error and delay. The knowledge gained from this holistic approach will then be used within the learning laboratory to inform the design, development, evaluation, and refinement of the solutions to diagnostic error and delay. "Control Tower" will be the staging ground for the in situ learning laboratory and will be built on top of a well-established clinical informatics infrastructure and hospital environment open to innovation and practice change.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 25551
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Adoption (Number of time the Control Tower used during the clinical encounters) 1 year Standardized process tracking sheets to track each time the control tower system is triggered and used.
Validation of automated phenotypes 1 year Use data from the patient electronic medical record to identify the number of diagnostic error or delay to validate clinical environment automated phenotypes
Implementation Acceptability 1 year Focused questions about beliefs, attitudes, usability by healthcare providers
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
🇺🇸Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Mayo Clinic Health System - Mankato MCHS
🇺🇸Mankato, Minnesota, United States