Preparing for Prevention of Huntington's Disease (PREVENT-HD)
- Conditions
- Huntington Disease
- Interventions
- Other: Clinical AssessmentsDiagnostic Test: MRI ScanDiagnostic Test: Lumber Puncture (LP)
- Registration Number
- NCT04818060
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, Madison
- Brief Summary
This is a prospective investigation which aims to address key challenges to the design of clinical trials to prevent the onset of Huntington's disease (HD). The project will provide necessary psychometric data for clinical outcome assessments (COAs) and biomarkers (BMs) in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) to address questions of central importance to the success of these measures for premanifest clinical trials. Of the 258 participants: 52 will be low risk of motor diagnosis, 102 high risk of motor diagnosis, 52 with diagnosed HD (stages I or II), and 52 healthy controls. Participants can expect to be in the study for up to 2 years.
- Detailed Description
This is a prospective investigation which aims to address key challenges to the design of clinical trials to prevent the onset of Huntington's disease (HD). The project will provide necessary psychometric data for clinical outcome assessments (COAs) and biomarkers (BMs) in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) to address questions of central importance to the success of this measure for premanifest clinical trials such as:
1. How reliable the measure is in the same person when repeated over time;
2. how reliable the measure is in the same person when analyzed by two different labs/sites;
3. how well the measure reflects disease symptoms;
4. how well the measure predicts meaningful disease outcomes;
5. how well the measure tracks disease progression or severity; AND
6. how many research subjects are required to test that an intervention is delaying/slowing the onset of HD?
Answers to these questions will better position the field to more effectively test new interventions to prevent HD such as gene therapies and new drugs.
Neurocognitive, motor and behavioral data, blood, CSF, and genetic samples, and MRI measures will be collected from 258 participants at baseline. Of the 258 participants: 52 will be low risk of motor diagnosis, 102 high risk of motor diagnosis, 52 with diagnosed HD (stages I or II), and 52 healthy controls. Neurocognitive and behavioral data, blood and CSF samples, and MRI will be repeated 2 years (18-24 months) after the baseline visit. Remote assessments of clinical outcome measures (neurocognitive, motor and behavioral data) will be conducted as needed.
Specific Study Aims and Methods
Aim 1: To evaluate Clinical Outcome Assessments (COAs) currently being used in premanifest HD. In accordance with the FDA, all types of COAs (a) Clinician-reported; (b) Observer-reported; (c) Patient-reported; and (d) Performance-based outcomes will be evaluated as appropriate for each phenotypic domain (motor, cognitive, psychiatric/behavioral, functional activity, quality of life). Specific outcomes of this aim will follow those recommended by the FDA including:
* a) Cross-sectional evaluation (critical for sample selection) of currently used COA instruments according to the following recommended criteria: mode of administration; format and scoring criteria; content validity; internal consistency reliability; test-retest reliability; floor and ceiling effects; construct validity; convergent validity; and strength of each COA expressed in terms of effect sizes.
* b) Longitudinal evaluation (critical for endpoint selection and responsiveness) of each COA to detect change using effect sizes across the premanifest and early HD disease continuum with documentation of the responder definition(s) of construct validity.
* c) Identification and documentation of the context of use (COU) and concept of interest (COI) for clinical trials in premanifest HD to position available COAs within a preliminary conceptual model.
Aim 2: To assess the psychometric properties of various biomarkers obtained from cerebral spinal fluid when compared between groups (premanifest HD, HD, NC) and over time (baseline and 2 years). Specific outcomes of this aim will include:
* a) CSF mHTT collected at baseline and 2 years in 100 premanifest HD, 25 diagnosed HD, and 25 healthy controls (HC) will be analyzed (blind to gene status) by two independent labs. Safety, feasibility, cost efficiency, and inter-site reliability will be obtained.
* b) Validity of CSF mutant huntingtin (mHTT) will be examined in HD groups for association with cross-sectional and longitudinal (a) phenotypic severity and decline using measures of the primary triad of clinical manifestation and progression (motor, cognitive, psychiatric/behavioral); (b) meaningful clinical outcome measures such as diagnosis in premanifest subjects and patient-reported outcomes, functional capacity and disability in all HD patients; and (c) available disease burden measures calculated as the product of Cytosine-Adenine-Guanine (CAG) repeat length and current age (considered a reflection of genetic toxicity by time survived; AKA disease burden). The investigators hypothesize that the candidate biomarkers will show appropriate association reflecting concurrent and predictive validity (types of criterion-related validity) with the most widespread "benchmarks" of HD phenotype, the Unified HD Rating Scale in diagnosed and advanced prodromal HD. Data from this Aim will immediately inform the interpretation of ongoing clinical trials that show biomarker levels in "some", but not "all", premanifest. Although it is unknown whether the biomarkers will demonstrate any predictive validity or concurrent validity for the entire premanifest HD group, data will immediately be useful to develop an evidence threshold for when in the premanifest HD prodrome, the biomarker will be detectable and tracked over time. The evidence threshold is immediately useful to the design of disease modifying trials in HD, particularly when the paramount goal is to prevent diagnosis, or manifestation.
* c) Biological criterion-related validity for biomarkers will be examined in HD groups for association with (a) microglial biomarkers; (b) inflammatory biomarkers; (c) neuronal death biomarkers; and (d) mHTT HD-specific protein. The investigators hypothesize that mHTT will show detection at the earliest point in the prodrome, followed by microglial markers, then inflammatory markers and, finally, neuron death markers in diagnosed HD.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 258
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description High Risk of Motor Diagnosis Clinical Assessments Approximately 102 participants who have a high probability of motor diagnosis based on the multivariate risk score. High Risk of Motor Diagnosis MRI Scan Approximately 102 participants who have a high probability of motor diagnosis based on the multivariate risk score. Healthy Controls MRI Scan Approximately 52 participants who are age-, ethnicity-, and education-matched healthy controls. Stage I or II Huntington's Disease Lumber Puncture (LP) Approximately 52 participants who are living with diagnosed stage I or stage II Huntington's Disease. Low Risk of Motor Diagnosis Lumber Puncture (LP) Approximately 52 participants who have a low probability of motor diagnosis based on the multivariate risk score. Stage I or II Huntington's Disease Clinical Assessments Approximately 52 participants who are living with diagnosed stage I or stage II Huntington's Disease. Stage I or II Huntington's Disease MRI Scan Approximately 52 participants who are living with diagnosed stage I or stage II Huntington's Disease. Healthy Controls Lumber Puncture (LP) Approximately 52 participants who are age-, ethnicity-, and education-matched healthy controls. Low Risk of Motor Diagnosis Clinical Assessments Approximately 52 participants who have a low probability of motor diagnosis based on the multivariate risk score. Low Risk of Motor Diagnosis MRI Scan Approximately 52 participants who have a low probability of motor diagnosis based on the multivariate risk score. High Risk of Motor Diagnosis Lumber Puncture (LP) Approximately 102 participants who have a high probability of motor diagnosis based on the multivariate risk score. Healthy Controls Clinical Assessments Approximately 52 participants who are age-, ethnicity-, and education-matched healthy controls.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) Total Functional Capacity 2 years UHDRS Total Functional Capacity is a clinician-rating scale of independence in activities of daily living. 13 is fully functioning and any drop in points in noted during pre-diagnosed HD.
Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) Diagnostic Confidence Level 2 years UHDRS Motor Diagnosis of HD Diagnostic Confidence Level is a clinical rating of how confident the movement disorder specialist is that the person has manifest HD with over 99% confidence; scale is 0-4 where 0 is 'normal' and 4 is the highest motor dysfunction.
Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) Total Motor Score 2 years UHDRS Total Motor Score is a 31-item instrument each item scored on a scale of 0-4 where 0 is 'normal' and 4 is the highest motor dysfunction. Total possible range of scores is 0-124.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method CANTAB composite score baseline, 1 year, 2 years The Cambridge automated neuropsychological test battery (CANTAB) has a range of scores and will be summed across tasks for a composite. Higher scores will indicate better cognitive processing.
Cognitive Assessment Battery (CAB) Composite Score baseline, 1 year, 2 years The CAB has a range of scores with higher scores indicative of better cognitive functions and a summed composite of the battery will be used as an outcome.
Tablet Cognitive Assessment Total (TabCat) Score baseline, 1 year, 2 years The TabCat scores range across multiple tasks and the outcome will be a summed composite score across all cognitive tasks. Higher scores will indicate better cognitive processing.
Problem Behavior Assessment - short form (PBA) Score baseline, 1 year, 2 years The PBA is an 11-item semi-structured instrument to assess the frequency and severity of behavioral symptoms of HD. Higher scores indicate increased severity and frequency of symptoms.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Wisconsin
🇺🇸Madison, Wisconsin, United States