MedPath

Early Feasibility EXperience of Posterior Leaflet RestOration to REduce Mitral Regurgitation

Terminated
Conditions
Mitral Valve Insufficiency
Mitral Valve Disease
Mitral Regurgitation
Registration Number
NCT04098328
Lead Sponsor
Polares Medical SA
Brief Summary

Early feasibility study, single-arm registry design

Detailed Description

First-In-Human

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
2
Inclusion Criteria
  1. 18 years of age or older.
  2. Greater than moderate degenerative or functional mitral regurgitation (Grade 3+ or higher) as confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) within 90 days prior to study procedure
  3. Patient must present with an STS Score less than 10%
  4. High surgical risk for conventional mitral repair or replacement due to morphological criteria (e.g. leaflet or annulus calcifications) as assessed by the local heart team comprised of a cardiac surgeon experienced in mitral valve surgery and a cardiologist experienced in treating mitral valve disease and heart failure
  5. Mitral valve anatomy deemed unsuitable to be treated with an approved edge-to-edge repair system (e.g., retracted posterior leaflet, lack of leaflet tissue, calcified or cleft posterior leaflet) as assessed by the local heart team comprised of a cardiac surgeon experienced in mitral valve surgery and a cardiologist experienced in treating mitral valve disease and heart failure
  6. Patient is approved by an independent Patient Eligibility Committee
  7. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class III or IV
  8. Patient willing to participate in study and provide signed EC-approved informed consent.
  9. Treating physician and patient agree that patient is able to return for all required post- procedure follow-up visits
  10. Women of child-bearing potential have a negative pregnancy test
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Severe tricuspid regurgitation
  2. Severe aortic stenosis or insufficiency
  3. Severe mitral annulus calcification
  4. Diseased mitral anterior leaflet such as flail / prolapse/ heavy calcification
  5. Implanted vena cava filter
  6. Femoral veins with severe angulation and calcification
  7. Contraindication for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or MDCT scan.
  8. Active infection or endocarditis
  9. Previous mitral valve surgery
  10. Prior orthotopic heart transplantation
  11. Pulmonary artery systolic hypertension > 70mmHg
  12. Evidence of intra-cardiac, inferior vena cava (IVC) or femoral venous thrombus
  13. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 30%
  14. Implant or revision of any pacing device < 30 days prior to intervention
  15. Symptomatic coronary artery disease treated < 30 days prior to study procedure
  16. Myocardial infarction requiring intervention < 30 days prior to study procedure
  17. Infiltrative cardiomyopathies (e.g., amyloidosis, hemochromatosis, sarcoidosis), hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathies, and constrictive pericarditis
  18. Active peptic ulcer or upper gastrointestinal bleeding < 90 days prior to study procedure
  19. Stroke < 180 days prior to study procedure
  20. Severe renal insufficiency (creatinine > 3.0 mg/dL) or patient requiring dialysis
  21. Cardiogenic shock at time of enrolment
  22. Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical heart assistance
  23. Concurrent medical condition with a life expectancy of less than 2 years
  24. Pregnancy at time of enrolment
  25. History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or leukopenia (WBC < 3,000 mcL) or acute anemia (Hb < 9 g/dL) or thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50,000 cells mcL)
  26. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, ticlopidine or clopidogrel, nitinol, tantalum or allergy to contrast agents that cannot be pre-medicated
  27. Severe dementia or lack of capacity due to conditions that result in either inability to provide informed consent for the trial/procedure, prevent independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up assessments
  28. Emergency situations
  29. Company employees or their immediate family members
  30. Patient is under guardianship
  31. Patient is participating in another clinical study for which follow-up is currently ongoing

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Primary safety endpoint30 days

All-cause mortality

Improvement from baseline mitral regurgitation30 days

Grade 2+ or less as evaluated by 2D transthoracic echocardiography

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Procedure success according to MVARC2 criteria30 days

* Absence of procedure mortality or stroke

* Proper placement and positioning of device

* Freedom from unplanned re-intervention related to device or access procedure

* Continued intended safety and performance of the device:

* No evidence of structural or functional failure

* No device technical failure issues/complications

* MR reduction to moderate or less without stenosis

* Absence of major device or procedure-related SAE:

* Death

* Stroke

* Life-threatening bleed

* Major vascular complication

* Major cardiac structural complication

* No device technical failure issues/complications

* Stage 2 or 3 AKI

* MI or coronary ischemia requiring PCI or CABG

* Shock, heart or respiratory failure requiring IV vasopressors, mechanical intervention or prolonged intubation

* Valve-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication requiring surgery or repeat intervention

Technical success according to MVARC2 criteria24 hours

* Absence of procedure mortality

* Successful access, delivery and retrieval of investigation delivery system

* Successful deployment and correct positioning of intended implant(s)

* Freedom from emergency surgery/re-intervention related to device or access procedure

Device success according to MVARC2 criteria30 days, 6 and 12 months, and 2 - 5 years post treatment

* Absence of procedure mortality or stroke

* Proper placement and positioning of device

* Freedom from unplanned re-intervention related to device or access procedure

* Continued intended safety and performance of the device:

* No evidence of structural or functional failure

* No device technical failure issues/complications

* MR reduction to moderate or less without stenosis

Patient success according to MVARC2 criteria30 days, 6 and 12 months, and 2 - 5 years post treatment

* Device success

* Patient returned to pre-procedure setting

* No rehospitalization or reintervention for mitral regurgitation or heart failure

* Functional improvement from baseline by one or more NYHA class

* 6MWT improvement from baseline by 50 metres or more

Rate (%) of major adverse events as defined by MVARC2 criteriaProcedure, discharge/7 days, 30 days, 6 and 12 months, and 2 - 5 years post treatment

All-cause mortality, hospitalization due to cardiac conditions, stroke or TIA, myocardial infarction, access site and vascular complications, bleeding complications, acute kidney injury up to 7 days post-procedure, and arrhythmias and conduction system disturbances

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

Inselspital Bern

🇨🇭

Bern, Switzerland

St. Johannes Hospital

🇩🇪

Dortmund, Germany

Luzerner Kantonsspital

🇨🇭

Luzern, Switzerland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath