Elbow Hemiarthroplasty Versus Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Irreparable Distal Humeral Fractures
- Conditions
- Distal Humerus Fracture
- Interventions
- Procedure: Elbow HemiarthroplastyProcedure: Total Elbow Arthroplasty
- Registration Number
- NCT03596736
- Lead Sponsor
- Linkoeping University
- Brief Summary
Distal humeral fractures can be difficult to treat, in particular when the joint surface is affected (intra-articular fractures). If rigid internal fixation with plates and screws can be obtained it is considered to be the treatment of choice. In elderly patients, poor bone quality (osteopenia) and fragmentation of the articular surface can make rigid internal fixation non-reliable or even impossible. Total elbow arthroplasty has been shown to be of value in this type of situation. Elbow hemiarthroplasty has been proposed as an alternative to total elbow arthroplasty. The theoretical advantages as opposed to total elbow arthroplasty are: no restriction in the weight allowed to be lifted, complications related to polyethylene wear debris are avoided as there is no polyethylene liner and there is no ulna component that can loosen. Wear of the native ulna and instability are potential complications of elbow hemiarthroplasty.
The aim of this multicenter study is to test the hypothesis that elbow hemiarthroplasty gives better elbow function than total elbow arthroplasty for irreparable distal humeral fractures.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 42
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Elbow Hemiarthroplasty Elbow Hemiarthroplasty - Total Elbow Arthroplasty Total Elbow Arthroplasty -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire 24 months The DASH questionnaire aims to assess symptoms and functional status of the upper extremities. It is a patient reported outcome measure that contains 30 core items. The score ranges from 0 to 100 points with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
🇸🇪Gothenburg, Sweden
Linköping University Hospital
🇸🇪Linköping, Sweden
Varberg Hospital
🇸🇪Varberg, Sweden