NCT02699398
Completed
Not Applicable
Domiciliary VR Rehabilitation
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Hemiparesis
- Sponsor
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra
- Enrollment
- 39
- Primary Endpoint
- Change in motor function for activities of daily living as measured by Chedoke Arm Hand Inventory clinical
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 10 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether domiciliary VR-based telerehabilitation is superior than domiciliary occupational therapy for inducing functional gains, enhancing corticospinal excitability, and cortical reorganization.
Investigators
Paul Verschure
PhD
Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Clinical diagnosis of Hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke
- •Subject had the stroke more than 12 months ago.
- •Subject presents mild-to-moderate upper-limbs hemiparesis (Proximal Medial Research Council Scale\>2) secondary to a first-ever stroke.
- •Age between 45 and 85 years old.
- •Subject has previous experience using the RGS system in the clinic.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Subject presents a major cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Evaluation\> 22).
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change in motor function for activities of daily living as measured by Chedoke Arm Hand Inventory clinical
Time Frame: At baseline, at 3-weeks (after intervention), and at 12-weeks follow-up.
Secondary Outcomes
- Change in cognitive function as measured by the Mini-mental State Evaluation test(At baseline, at 3-weeks (after intervention), and at 12-weeks follow-up.)
- Change in depression as measured by the Hamilton scale(At baseline, at 3-weeks (after intervention), and at 12-weeks follow-up.)
- Change in motor function as measured by the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment(At baseline, at 3-weeks (after intervention), and at 12-weeks follow-up.)
- Change in spasticity for the upper arms as measured by the Ashworth scale(At baseline, at 3-weeks (after intervention), and at 12-weeks follow-up.)
- Change in shoulder pain as measured by the Visual Analog Assessment scale(At baseline, at 3-weeks (after intervention), and at 12-weeks follow-up.)
- Change in motor function as measured by the Medical Research Council scale(At baseline, at 3-weeks (after intervention), and at 12-weeks follow-up.)
- Change in Grip Force as measured by a grip dynamometer(At baseline, at 3-weeks (after intervention), and at 12-weeks follow-up.)
Similar Trials
Unknown
Not Applicable
Upper Limb Telerehabilitation With Virtual Reality in Multiple SclerosisMultiple SclerosisNCT04032431University of Cagliari24
Completed
Not Applicable
Virtual vs. Traditional Physical Therapy Following Total Knee ReplacementTotal Knee ReplacementNCT02914210Duke University306
Completed
Not Applicable
Virtual Physical Rehabilitation for Patients Living with Long COVIDCOVID-19Post COVID-19Long COVIDNCT05298878McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre132
Completed
Not Applicable
Virtual Reality Rehabilitation for Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionKnee InjuriesNCT05080894Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer44
Completed
Not Applicable
Virtual Reality (VR) Treatment for Balance Problems in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)Traumatic Brain InjuryNCT01794585Craig Hospital62