MedPath

Two Methods of Lip Taping as a Presurgical Orthopedic Appliance

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Cleft Lip and Palate
Interventions
Device: Lip taping
Registration Number
NCT05796336
Lead Sponsor
University of Baghdad
Brief Summary

A randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of two methods of lip taping as a presurgical orthopedic appliances on maxillary arch dimensions in infants with bilateral cleft lip and palate.

Detailed Description

It is a multicenter randomized clinical trial with two parallel arms. The patients will be randomly divided into two groups, group one: a passive orthopedic appliance will be used with conventional steri strip, and group two will receive a passive orthopedic appliance with a custom-made tape consist of steri strip and orthodontic elastic. Impressions will be taken before starting the treatment (T1) and at the end of treatment (T2) three months later. The effectiveness of the two methods of taping will be assessed and measured on digital models of the maxillary arch before and after the treatment.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
24
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Non-Syndromic infants with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.
  2. Both sexes.
  3. Age range from 1-30 day
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Infants with systemic syndromes.
  2. infants with unilateral cleft
  3. infants whom parents refuse to consent.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Passive lip tapingLip tapingWill receive passive baby feeding plate and conventional steri strip
Custom-made tapeLip tapingwill receive passive baby feeding plate and custom-made tape (Steri Srip and orthodontic elastics)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Assessment of maxillary arch dimension changeT1 before starting any treatment and T2 After treatment before surgical repair (average 3 months)]

To evaluate the effect of the lip taping as a presurgical orthopedic on the maxillary arch dimensions for infants with bilateral cleft using two different types of medical taping.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Assessment of Angular measurement changeT1 before starting any treatment and T2 After treatment before surgical repair (average 3 months)]

The angular measurements of arch dimensions in degrees before and after treatment with both methods of lip taping in both experimental groups.

Angular measurements for maxillary arch assessments in degrees:

Anterior arch curvature angle (AIA')

Assessment of Parents Perception and experienceT1 before starting any treatment and T2 After treatment before surgical repair (average 3 months)]

The perception and experience of parents of children with cleft lip and palate concerning the use presurgical infant orthopedics using a questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey. The assessment of mothers' perception and experience regarding PSIO will be executed using 15 validated preformed questions.

Assessment of Linear measurement changeT1 before starting any treatment and T2 After treatment before surgical repair (average 3 months)]

The linear measurements of arch dimensions in millimeter before and after treatment with both methods of lip taping in both experimental groups

Linear measurements for maxillary arch assessments in millimeters:

* Antero-posterior arch length (I-ITT')

* Posterior arch width (T-T')

* Alveolar cleft widths (AP); Right cleft and (A'P') Left cleft

* Mid-palatal arch width (C-C')

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

College of Dentistry

🇮🇶

Baghdad, Al-Rusaffa, Iraq

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath