MedPath

Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of ABT-335 in Combination With Simvastatin in Subjects With Multiple Abnormal Lipid Levels in the Blood

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Dyslipidemia
Coronary Heart Disease
Mixed Dyslipidemia
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT00300456
Lead Sponsor
Abbott
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of fenofibric acid (ABT-335) + simvastatin combination therapy with ABT-335 and simvastatin monotherapy in subjects with multiple abnormal lipid levels in the blood.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
657
Inclusion Criteria
  • Subjects with mixed dyslipidemia
  • Subjects agree to utilize adequate birth control methods and to adhere to the American Heart Association (AHA) diet.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Subjects with unstable medical conditions or medical conditions considered inappropriate in a clinical trial.
  • Patients who are taking certain medications or unstable dose of specific medications.
  • Women who are pregnant or plan on becoming pregnant, or women who are lactating.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
CABT-335ABT-335 monotherapy
AABT-335ABT-335 + 20 mg simvastatin
BABT-335ABT-335 + 40 mg simvastatin
BSimvastatinABT-335 + 40 mg simvastatin
CPlaceboABT-335 monotherapy
DSimvastatin20 mg simvastatin monotherapy
DPlacebo20 mg simvastatin monotherapy
ESimvastatin40 mg simvastatin monotherapy
EPlacebo40 mg simvastatin monotherapy
FSimvastatin80 mg simvastatin monotherapy
FPlacebo80 mg simvastatin monotherapy
ASimvastatinABT-335 + 20 mg simvastatin
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Final VisitBaseline to 12 Weeks (Final Visit)

\[(Week 12 triglycerides minus baseline triglycerides)/baseline triglycerides\] x 100

Mean Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Final VisitBaseline to 12 Weeks (Final Visit)

\[(Week 12 HDL-C minus baseline HDL-C)/baseline HDL-C\] x 100

Mean Percent Change in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Final VisitBaseline to 12 Weeks (Final Visit)

\[(Week 12 LDL-C minus baseline LDL-C)/baseline LDL-C\] x 100

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Percent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) From Baseline to Final VisitBaseline to 12 Weeks (Final Visit)

\[(Week 12 non-HDL-C minus baseline non-HDL-C)/baseline non-HDL-C\] x 100

Mean Percent Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C)From Baseline to Final VisitBaseline to 12 Weeks (Final Visit)

\[(Week 12 VLDL-C minus baseline VLDL-C)/baseline VLDL-C\] x 100

Mean Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Final VisitBaseline to 12 Weeks (Final Visit)

\[(Week 12 total cholesterol minus baseline total cholesterol)/baseline total cholesterol\] x 100

Mean Percent Change in Lipoprotein Apo B (Apo B) From Baseline to Final VisitBaseline to 12 Weeks (Final Visit)

\[(Week 12 Apo B minus baseline Apo B)/baseline Apo B\] x 100

Median Percent Change in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) From Baseline to Final VisitBaseline to 12 Weeks (Final Visit)

\[(Week 12 hsCRP minus baseline hsCRP)/baseline hsCRP\] x 100

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Global Medical Information

🇺🇸

North Chicago, Illinois, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath