se of continuous versus intermittent dose of local anaesthesia drug in middle thigh block (Adductor canal block)and its effect on reduction of pain and requirement of morphine after knee arthroscopic ligament surgery
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- Patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2014/04/004553
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive careGovernment Medical College and Hospital Chandigarh
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 50
Inclusion Criteria
American society of anaesthesiologist physical status of I or II
Either sex
Aged between 18 to 60 years
Having body mass index 18 to 35 kg per metre square
Exclusion Criteria
American society of anaesthesiologist > II
History of substance abuse
History of psychiatric illness
History of medical therapies accountable for chronic opioid use
Patients possessing any contraindication to peripheral nerve block (localized infection, sepsis, lower extremity neuromuscular disorder, coagulopathy)
Patientâ??s having inability to understand the visual analogue scale
Patientâ??s inability to understand the use of patient controlled analgesia pump
Allergy to study drugs
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the morphine sparing effect of ultrasound guided continuous versus intermittent adductor canal block for postoperative pain relief in adult patients undergoing arthroscopic knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction <br/ ><br>Timepoint: Immediately after block 0 hr <br/ ><br>2 hr <br/ ><br>4 hr <br/ ><br>6 hr <br/ ><br>8 hr <br/ ><br>12 hr <br/ ><br>24 hr
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method