MedPath

The Effects of Flow Settings During High Flow Nasal Cannula for Adult Hypoxemia Patients

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Hypoxemia
Interventions
Other: HFNC flow
Registration Number
NCT03738345
Lead Sponsor
Rush University Medical Center
Brief Summary

High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) delivers oxygen at a flow which exceeds the patient's inspiratory flow demand in order to improve oxygenation. Numerous randomized control trials and meta-analyses have shown that HFNC improves oxygenation and helps avoid intubation in hypoxemic patients, as well as reduce work of breathing, improve ventilation, and decrease hypercapnia in COPD patients. Flow settings play a critical role when using HFNC, as increased flow can reduce inspiratory effort, improve ventilation, and dynamic lung compliance. However, flow rates used in many studies vary widely. The clinical effects of different HFNC flow setting, specifically to match or over than a patients' own inspiratory flow, is still unknown.

Detailed Description

High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) delivers oxygen at a flow which exceeds the patient's inspiratory flow demand in order to improve oxygenation. Numerous randomized control trials and meta-analyses have shown that HFNC improves oxygenation and helps avoid intubation in hypoxemic patients, as well as reduce work of breathing, improve ventilation, and decrease hypercapnia in COPD patients. Flow settings play a critical role when using HFNC, as increased flow can reduce inspiratory effort, improve ventilation, and dynamic lung compliance. However, flow rates used in many studies vary widely, from 20-40 LPM in COPD patients and 30-60 LPM in hypoxemic patients. The clinical effects of different HFNC flow setting, specifically to match or over than a patients' own inspiratory flow, is still unknown.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
49
Inclusion Criteria

Adult patients (Age > 18yrs and < 90yrs) who need nasal cannula oxygen flow ≥ 5 L/min to maintain SpO2 at 90-97%.

Exclusion Criteria (Common): - Unable to use resuscitation mask, such as facial trauma, claustrophobia

  • Inability to verbally communicate;
  • Pregnant
  • Inability to breathe via nose, such as nasosinusitis, stuffy nose or nasal obstruction, etc.
  • Ordered SpO2 goal is above 97%
  • FIO2 needs ≤ 0.4
  • Using inhaled pulmonary vasodilator via HFNC
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Lung expansion on healthy volunteerHFNC flowAdult healthy volunteers will be recruited, their own breathing profiles (inspiratory flow, respiratory rates and tidal volume) will be measured. Then they will be placed on HFNC, HFNC flow will be increased sequentially by research protocol and their comfort, subjects' lung expansion effects in different flow will be quantified by Electrical impedance tomography (EIT), a noninvasive assessment tool. Their comfort will also be assessed using a visual scale.
Oxygenation on hypoxemia patientsHFNC flowAdult patients with hypoxemia will be recruited, their own breathing profiles (inspiratory flow, respiratory rates and tidal volume) will be measured. Then patients will be placed on high flow nasal cannula (HFNC), HFNC flow will be titrated based on the hospital's policy or protocol and patient's comfort, patient's clinical effects on oxygenation will be monitored and recorded during the titration process.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
SpO2/FIO2 increment for hypoxemic patients30 minutes

SpO2/FIO2 at the optimal/maximum /tolerable/ HFNC flow setting compared to the SpO2/FIO2 at HFNC flow matching patient's inspiratory flow or 30 L/min for hypoxemic patients

RR change for hypoxemic patients30 minutes

Respiratory rates at the optimal/maximum /tolerable/ HFNC flow setting compared to the SpO2/FIO2 at HFNC flow matching patient's inspiratory flow or 30 L/min for hypoxemic patients

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
comfort scores30 minutes

comfort will be self-evaluation using a visual analog scale with measured score of 0 is the worst and 10 is the best

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Rush University Medical Center

🇺🇸

Chicago, Illinois, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath