Optimizing Resilience and Coping in HIV Via Internet Delivery
- Conditions
- DepressionPsychological StressHIV DiseaseAffect
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Intervention
- Registration Number
- NCT01997008
- Lead Sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Brief Summary
This is a feasibility/pilot test of a set of positive affect skills provided online to HIV positive people with elevated depressive symptoms - a Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale D (CES-D) score \> 10. The investigators will test the feasibility of recruitment, retention and acceptability of these skills in an online delivery format, determine feasibility and acceptability of daily emotion assessments via text messaging and assess efficacy of these skills for improving psychological well-being this population.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 22
- HIV +
- 18 or older
- Score of CES-D depression scale >10
- Daily internet access
- Smart phone ownership
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Intervention Intervention Participants receive a five week intervention providing the following activities: EMA: Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) of Emotion throughout the day. Intervention: Positive Events: Participants identify a positive event and then describe how they capitalized on this event. Gratitude: Participants identify one more more things that make them feel grateful. Mindfulness: Participants participate in a 30 minute guided mindfulness/meditation practice. Positive Reappraisal: Participants identify how they reappraised a negative event making it into a positive event. Personal Strengths: Participants identify one more more personal strengths. Attainable goals: Participants identify a short-term attainable goal. Participants will outline what they did that day to work toward attaining their week's goal. Acts of Kindness: Participants will identify one more more acts of kindness that they engaged in and how it made them feel.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Retention of participants in online delivery format. 5 weeks post enrollment. May be slightly more or less for intervention participants depending on time taken to complete online content. We will track, for each participant who completes a screening questionnaire, where they heard about the study and the proportion who go on to enroll. We will track retention - noting when participants drop out to determine if particular sessions or activities result in less retention than other areas.
Acceptability of ORCHID content 5 weeks post enrollment. May be slightly more or less for intervention participants depending on time taken to complete online content. We will track participation in both the self-report questionnaires as well as the intervention sessions (e.g., number of ORCHID sessions completed, amount of home practice completed). We will carefully track usage - noting when participants who leave the study drop out to determine if there are particular sessions that are less acceptable than others.
Feasibility of an online delivery format. 5 weeks post enrollment. May be slightly more or less for intervention participants depending on time taken to complete online content. We will follow up with participants who have significant missing data to determine areas in which the protocol is feasible and to highlight areas for improvements. We will summarize participant feedback regarding the protocol and will use this feedback to inform the subsequent proposals.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Determine acceptability of multiple daily emotion assessments using text messaging. 5 weeks post enrollment. May be slightly more or less for intervention participants depending on time taken to complete online content. To measure this outcome, we will first document if anyone declines participation due to the perceived burden of the Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) protocol. We will carefully document adherence to the protocol and the proportion of assessments that participants complete. In the follow-up interviews, we will have questions specific to the EMA protocol to elicit feedback and suggestions for improvement
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of California, San Francisco
🇺🇸San Francisco, California, United States