Use and Opinions' Concerning Medicines Related Errors, Monitoring and Audit Tools Used to Assess Medicines Optimisation Within Care Homes in England
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- Enrolling By Invitation
- 入组人数
- 152
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Barriers and facilitators: qualitative semi-structured individual interviews
研究概览
简要总结
To describe the barriers and facilitators experienced by residents, health and social care staff, commissioners and regulators when managing medicines within care homes.
详细描述
The prescribing of medicines is the most frequent health intervention in England. The administration or omission of medicines is not without risk and incidents involving medicines occur. The frequency of prescribing medicines increases with age and frailty. People living in care homes (with and without nursing) are generally older and more frail than similar groups in the community. Therefore, care homes and their staff need to be proficient and safe when administering medicines.
However, an under investigated area of prescribed medicines is the views of people living in care homes, health and social care staff, commissioners and regulator about managing medicines in care homes.
During the study a series of semi-structured interviews and focus groups will be undertaken. These focus groups will be held with people living in care homes (with and without nursing). Further interviews and focus groups will be held with health and social care staff, commissioners and regulators.
Care homes will be invited to provide copies of their current medicines monitoring tool. In addition, services supporting care homes including community pharmacies will also be invited to provide copies of their current medicines monitoring tools.
Analysis of conversations and monitoring tools made available to the study team will be undertaken and compared to published literature including grey literature.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Other
- 时间视角
- Retrospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •within pre-agreed areas,
- •registered with the regulator (CQC) for the regulated activities of Residential Care (with or without nursing) that have consented to participate.
- •Theses care homes will also be registered for one or more of the following specialisms:
- •dementia,
- •mental health conditions,
- •physical disabilities,
- •sensory impairments,
- •caring for adults under 65 years
- •caring for adults over 65 years.
- •Residents who have capacity and an adequate understanding of written and verbal English to consent and participate of participating care homes.
- •Care home staff, including registered managers who have an adequate understanding of written and verbal English to consent and participate of participating care homes.
- •Visiting health and social care staff who support care homes in the study locality.
- •Commissioner and regulatory staff with oversight of care homes in the study locality.
- •Medicines monitoring tools used by participating
- •care homes,
- •community pharmacies supporting the participating care homes
- •commissioners and regulators with oversight of care homes in the study locality.
排除标准
- •Care homes registered with the regulator (CQC)
- •outside of the pre-agreed areas.
- •Care homes registered with the regulator (CQC)
- •within the pre-agreed areas for the regulated activities of Residential Care (with or without nursing) that are also registered for the specialism of supporting younger people.
- •Residents of participating care homes judged by staff to lack capacity, an adequate understanding of written and verbal English to consent and participate, too unwell or might find it distressing.
- •Staff in participating care homes who lack an adequate understanding of written and verbal English to consent and participate.
结局指标
主要结局
Barriers and facilitators: qualitative semi-structured individual interviews
时间窗: 0 to 9 months
Transcribed interviews will be coded and then emerging themes from the data identified and developed. A constant comparison method of analysis will be used. The presence or lack of consensus and reinforcement on certain topics will also be observed.
Similarities and differences: current medicines monitoring tools
时间窗: 9 to 12 months
Current medicines monitoring tools will be coded and then emerging themes from the data identified and developed. A constant comparison method of analysis will be used. The presence or lack of consensus and reinforcement on certain topics will also be observed.
Qualitative comparative analysis
时间窗: 9 to 12 months
Themes and topics that emerged from the interviews, focus groups and current medicines monitoring tools will be compared and contrasted with each other and the evidence identified from a separate scoping review.
Barriers and facilitators: qualitative semi-structured focus groups
时间窗: 0 to 9 months
Transcribed focus groups will be coded and then emerging themes from the data identified and developed. A constant comparison method of analysis will be used. The presence or lack of consensus and reinforcement on certain topics will also be observed.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Malcolm Irons
Principal Investigator
University of Central Lancashire